USING INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN DEVELOPING A CULTURE OF COOPERATION AMONG STUDENTS OF NON-LINGUISTIC HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22481/praxisedu.v16i37.6166Palavras-chave:
Inovação, Métodos de ensino, Trabalho em equipe, Competência intercultural, Motivação, Tolerância comunicativaResumo
Este estudo investigou os problemas relacionados com a cultura de cooperação entre estudantes de instituições de ensino superior não linguístico e o uso de tecnologias interactivas como solução para estes problemas. A relevância da pesquisa reside na iluminação das contradições entre a necessidade de construir ambientes de comunicação que correspondam à transformação e modernização da educação russa na Federação Russa, a insuficiente elaboração teórica desta questão, as novas exigências no campo da educação [Lei Federal sobre Educação na Federação Russa a partir de 29 de dezembro de 2012, No. 273-FZ (conforme estipulado numa emenda em 29 de dezembro de 2017), a Doutrina Nacional de Educação da Federação Russa até 2025, a Norma Federal Estadual de Educação Superior], e a preparação inadequada dos estudantes para serem sujeitos do seu desenvolvimento em contextos educacionais inovadores. Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo justificar teoricamente o desenvolvimento de uma cultura cooperativa entre estudantes que utilizam tecnologias interativas. Seus fundamentos metodológicos foram as disposições e os princípios de abordagens orientadas para a personalidade, baseadas na competência e os fundamentos da competência intercultural. O significado teórico do estudo reflete-se por (1) sua integração de tecnologias pedagógicas a partir do cultivo de situações educacionais desejadas e da implementação de tecnologias educacionais em colaboração com inovações interativas e por (2) a transição da educação informativa e explicativa para a adoção inovadora e eficaz de tecnologias interativas no processo educacional, o que envolve também orientações de desenvolvimento e pessoais. O significado prático da pesquisa reside no seu desenvolvimento e organização de trabalhos experimentais sobre a evolução da cultura cooperativa acima mencionada. Na experiência, foram modificadas e testadas tecnologias pedagógicas interativas para o ensino do inglês, tais como métodos de caso, abordagens de projetos, jogos de papéis, jogos de negócios e debates. Foram formuladas as formas pelas quais estas tecnologias podem ser utilizadas eficazmente nas instituições de ensino superior, permitindo assim aos estudantes cultivar competên
Downloads
Referências
Al-Ameedi, R.T., Ibrahim, E.R., & Nayef, K.J. (2019). Language Laboratory and Developing Skills in an Iraqi Secondary School. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 54(5). http://jsju.org/index.php/journal/article/view/414
Azhibekova, G.Zh. (2014). Innovative Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages. European Scientist, 68(2-1), 238-243.
Baloche, L., & Brody, M.C. (2017). Cooperative Education: Exploring Challenges, Crafting Innovations. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 274-283.
Barakhsanova, E.A., & Barakhsanov, V.P. (2018). Training Students to Use E-Learning Technology. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 6. http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=28231
Bespalko, V.P. (1989). Components of Educational Technology. Moscow: Pedagogy.
Bordovskaya, N.V., Kostromina, S.N., Darinskaya, L.А. (2020). Modern Educational Technologies. Moscow: Knorus.
Boyko, V.V. (1996). Emotions Energy in the Communication: Look at Yourself and at Others. Moscow: Information and Publishing House "Filin".
Federal Law No. 273-FZ on Education in the Russian Federation as of December 29, 2012 (as amended on December 29, 2017).
Federal State Educational Standard for Higher Education. http://fgosvo.ru/fgosvo/92/91/4
Foster, J., & Yaoyuneyong, G. (2016). Teaching Innovation: Equipping Students to Overcome Real-World Challenges. Higher Education Pedagogies, 1(1), 42-56.
Hassanien, A. (2006). Student Experience of Group Work and Group Assessment in Higher Education. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 6(1), 17-39.
Ivanova, A.V., Skryabina, A.G., & Darbasova, L.A. (2019). The Competency-Based Approach in Teaching Mathematics to Students of an Agricultural University. Higher Education Today, 8, 28-32.
Jasińska, M. (2019). Recognition and Description of Synergy Conditions in Team Work in View of the Grounded Theory. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 375-397.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2009). Making Cooperative Learning Work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67-73.
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative Learning. San Juan Capistrano, California: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
Khutorskoy, A.V. (2005). Pedagogical Innovation - The Lever of Education. Eidos, http://eidos.ru/journal/2005/0910-19.htm.
Klarin, M.V. (1998). Innovations in World Pedagogy: Education Based on Research, Play, and Discussion (Analysis of Foreign Experience). Riga: Scientific Production Centre "Experiment".
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2017). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103-122.
Luskanova, A.G. (n.d.) Methodology for Determining School Motivation. https://studbooks.net/1666678/psihologiya/metodika_opredeleniya_shkolnoy_motivatsii_luskanovoy
Luskanova, N.G. (1993). School Motivation Level Assessment. https://uchitelya.com/pedagogika/139602-anketa-ocenka-urovnya-shkolnoy-motivacii-ng-luskanovoy.html
Malysheva, A.D. (2018). Formation of Readiness for Work in a Team of Bilingual Students (on the Example of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)). Perspectives of Science and Education, 4(34), 15-20.
Moreno, J.L. (1956). Sociometry and the Science of Man. Painswick: Beacon House.
National Doctrine of Education of the Russian Federation until 2025. http://med45ved.ucoz.ru/orkse/nac_doktr.pdf
Nelunova, E.D. (2014). Pedagogical Foundations of Self-Development of Students in a Multimedia Educational Environment (Doctoral Thesis). Yakutsk-Yaroslavl.
Nikolaeva, A.D., Barakhsanova, E.A., Golikov, A.I., Alekseyeva, I.S., Egorova, R.I., Kolpakova, A.P., & Stepanova, L.V. (2016). Linguistic Determination of the Personality. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(11). http://www.indjst.org/index.php/indjst/article/view/89424
Nikolaeva, A.D., & Malysheva, A.D. (2017). The Development of Students' Teamwork Skills in Foreign Language Lessons. Discussion, 5(79), 102-109.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Panina, S.V., Barahsanova, E.A., Nikolaeva, A.D., Osipova, O.D., Stepanova, L.V., & Sivseva, K.N. (2017). Synergetic Approach to the Learning Process Organization for Future Education Managers’ Training at Higher Education Institutions. Espacios, 38(55), 9.
Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T.S. (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, C. (1988). Client-Centered Therapy. H.I. Kaplan, & B.J. Sadock (Eds.), Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry (pp. 3-40). Baltimore, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins.
Selevko, G.K. (1998). Modern Educational Technologies. Moscow: National Education.
Smolkin, A.M. (1991). Methods of Active Education. Moscow: Higher School.
Ter-Minasova, S.G. (2000). Language and Intercultural Communication. Moscow: Slovo.
Troyanskaya, S.L. (2008). General Cultural Competence: Experience in Defining and Structuring. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2, 19-23.
Verbitsky, A.A. (2004). The Competency-Based Approach and the Theory of Contextual Education. Moscow: Research Center for Continuing Education and Professional Reeducation.
Vygotsky, L.S. (2019). Thinking and Speech: Psychological Research. Moscow: National Education.
Zimnyaya, I.A. (2006). Key Competencies - A New Paradigm of the Result of Modern Education. Eidos. http://www.eidos.ru/journal/2006/0505.htm