Difference, simulacrum and thought: the proposal of the dramatization method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/el.v19i1.9153

Keywords:

Difference; Simulacrum; Thought; Dramatization method.

Abstract

This article is configured as an attempt to present the perspective of thought present in the proposal of the dramatization method by Gilles Deleuze, which is done by a positive valuation of the idea of ​​difference and simulacrum. Therefore, we will present the Platonic considerations around the passage of time and the permanence, present in the theory of forms, that support the search for truth in the representative thought method, as well the criticisms of this model, made by the philosopher Gilles Deleuze under discussion contained in the appendix of the work “Logic of the sense” (1969), with its proposal of to reverse the Platonism. Then, we bring the text “The dramatization method” (1967) to extract from it the presentation of a new way of thinking that, based on the proposal of valuation the pure difference, breaks with a will to truth based on transcendent and moral foundations, and presents a condition of thought immanent to existence, valuing the body, its encounters and its experiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Amanda Souza Ávila Lobo, State University of Southwest of Bahia (UESB/Brazil)

Amanda Souza Ávila Lobo, PhD student in the Postgraduate Program in Memory: Language and Society, State University of Southwest Bahia (PPGMLS/UESB). She is a Memory Master through the same program. University Technician at the State University of Southwest Bahia (UESB). She is a member of the Research Groups: Cinema and Audiovisual: Memory and Processes of Cultural Formation (UESB) and Culture, Memory and Development (UNB). She is a member of the Cineclube cinema-minor (RJ). She is a FAPESB Scholar.

Danilo Moraes Lobo, State University of Southwest of Bahia (UESB/Brazil)

Danilo Moraes Lobo is a PhD student in the Postgraduate Program in Memory: Language and Society, State University of Southwest Bahia (PPGMLS/UESB). He is a Memory Master through the same program. University Technician at the State University of Southwest Bahia (UESB). He is a member of the Research Groups: Cinema and Audiovisual: Memory and Processes of Cultural Formation (UESB) and Culture, Memory and Development (UNB). He is a member of the Cineclube cinema-minor (RJ). He is a FAPESB Scholar.

Milene de Cássia Silveira Gusmão, State University of Southwest of Bahia (UESB/Brazil)

Milene de Cássia Silveira Gusmão holds a PhD in Social Sciences from the Federal University of Bahia (UFBA). She is a Full Professor at the State University of Southwest Bahia. She is a Professor of the undergraduate course in Cinema and Audiovisual. She is a professor and researcher at the Graduate Program in Memory: Language and Society (UESB). She coordinates the Interinstitutional Masters in Memory: Language and Society (UESB / IFMA agreement). Leader of the Research Group on Cinema and Audiovisual: Memory and Cultural Formation Processes. Researcher at the Culture, Memory and Development Research Group (CMD/UnB). Member of the Latin American Network in Education, Film and Audiovisual – Kino Network.

References

DAMASCENO, Veronica. Do trágico à dramatização em Nietzsche e Deleuze. O que nos faz pensar, [S.l.], v. 20, n. 30, p. 132-152, dez. 2011. ISSN 0104-6675. Disponível em: http://www.oquenosfazpensar.fil.puc-rio.br/index.php/oqnfp/article/view/346. Acesso em: 18 jan 2021.

DAMASCENO, Veronica. Sobre o método de dramatização em Gilles Deleuze. Dois Pontos. Curitiba, São Carlos, vol. 8, n. 2, p. 157-174, out, 2011.

DELEUZE, Gilles. Diferença e Repetição. Rio de Janeiro/São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2018. Trabalho original: 1968.

DELEUZE, Gilles. Lógica do sentido. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2015. Trabalho original: 1969.

DELEUZE, Gilles. Nietzsche e a Filosofia. Editora Rio, 2014. Trabalho original: 1962.

DELEUZE, Gilles. O método de dramatização. In: A ilha deserta e outros textos (textos e entrevistas 1953-1974). Edição preparada por David Lapoujade. São Paulo: Iluminuras Ltda, 2014. Trabalho original: 1967.

FORNAZARI, Sandro K. A crítica deleuziana ao primado da identidade em Aristóteles e em Platão. Revista Trans/Form/Ação, Marília, v. 34, n. 2, p. 3-20, 2011. PLATÃO. Sofista (ou Do ser). In: Diálogos I: Teeteto (ou do conhecimento); Sofista (ou do ser); Protágoras (ou sofistas). Bauru, SP: EDIPRO, 2007.

PLATÃO. Fédon (ou Da alma). In: Diálogos III: (socráticos): Fedro (ou do belo); Eutífron (ou da religiosidade); Apologia de Sócrates; Críton (ou do dever); Fédon (ou da alma). Bauru, SP: EDIPRO, 2008.

PELLEJERO. Eduardo. Nietzsche como falsário: a apropriação deleuziana da potência do falso. In: Existência e Arte – Revista Eletrônica do Grupo PET Ciências Humanas, Estética da Universidade Federal de São João Del-Rei – Ano VII – Número VI – jan a dez 2011.

SCHOPKE, Regina. Por uma filosofia da diferença: Gilles Deleuze, o pensador nômade. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2012.

SCHOPKE, Regina. Deleuze e o mundo dos simulacros. In: Teoria del conocimiento, s/d. Disponível em: https://arielenlinea.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/deleuze-e-o-mundo-dos-simulacros-regina-schc3b6pke-pc3a1g-43-47.pdf. Acessado em: 01/04/2021.

ZOURABICHIVILI, François. Deleuze: uma filosofia do acontecimento. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-22

How to Cite

LOBO, A. S. Ávila; LOBO, D. M.; GUSMÃO, M. de C. S. Difference, simulacrum and thought: the proposal of the dramatization method. Language Studies, [S. l.], v. 19, n. 1, p. 95-111, 2021. DOI: 10.22481/el.v19i1.9153. Disponível em: https://periodicos2.uesb.br/index.php/estudosdalinguagem/article/view/9153. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2021): Estudos da Língua(gem

Section

Papers

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Language Studies

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Estudos da Língua(gem) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in the journal Estudos da Língua (gem) agree with the following terms:
The journal Estudos de Língua(gem) maintains the copyrights of the contributions published. These rights include the publication of the contribution and make its content available for free through the portal.