THE NOTION OF ARGUMENTATIVE CAPACITY IN DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES FOR THE STUDY OF ARGUMENTATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/folio.v13i2.9324

Keywords:

Capacity Development. Teaching argumentation. Different Trends.

Abstract

This article aims to discuss the concept of capacity, reflecting on the contributions of the different aspects found in the literature so that we can delimit how these works present the concept of argumentation and its application in teaching. This reflection proves to be opportune because it allows us to question the foundations that should support the development of students' abilities at school and contribute, in future research, to the organization of content and teaching-learning methodologies for argumentation. The bibliographic methodology allowed mapping, collating and discussing concepts that encompass the notions of ability, capacity and competence exclusively directed to the act of arguing, such as distinctly found in Kuhn (1991), Golder (1992), Dolz (1994; 1996), Camps and Dolz (1995), Felton and Kuhn (2001), Hample (2003), Kuhn and Udell (2003), Dolz and Schneuwly (2004) and Azevedo (2013; 2016; 2019). The results allowed us to observe that the main gaps found regarding the teaching of argumentation from the perspective of capabilities can be minimized by understanding its dispersion in different perspectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sheyla Fabrícia Alves Lima, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Uesc)

Doutoranda em Letras pela Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Uesc).

Eduardo Lopes Piris, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Uesc)

Doutorado em Filologia e Língua Portuguesa pela Universidade de São Paulo (Usp). Professor Titular nível A da Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Uesc).

References

AZEVEDO, I. C. M de. Confluencias y distinciones entre las nociones de capacidad y competencia argumentativas. In: VITALE, M. A et al. (Org.). Estudios sobre discurso y argumentación. Coimbra: Grácio Editor, 2019. p. 167-193.

AZEVEDO, I. C. M de. Capacidades argumentativas de professores e estudantes da educação básica em discussão. In: PIRIS, E. L.; FERREIRA, M. O. (Orgs.). Discurso e argumentação em múltiplos enfoques. Grácio Editor: Coimbra, 2016. p. 167-190.

AZEVEDO, I. C. M de. Desenvolvimento de competências e capacidades de linguagem por meio da escrita de textos de opinião. EID&A - Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação, Ilhéus, n.4, p. 35-47, jun. 2013.

BEREITER, C.; SCARDAMALIA; M. From conversation to composition: the role of instruction in a developmental process. In: GLASER, R. (Ed.). Advances in Instructional Psychology, vol. 2, Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum, p. 1-64, 1982.

CAMPS, A.; DOLZ, J. Introducción: Enseñar a argumentar: un desafío para la escuela actual. Comunicación, Lenguaje y Educación, nº 25, p. 5-8, 1995.

DOLZ, J. La interacción de las actividades orales y escritas en la enseñanza de la argumentación. Comunicación, Lenguaje y Educación, nº 6: v. 3, p. 17-27, 1994.

DOLZ, J. Learning Argumentative Capacities A Study of the Effects of a Systematic and Intensive Teaching of Argumentative Discourse in 11-12 Year Old Children. Argumentation, nº 10, p. 227-251, 1996.

DOLZ, J. Como Enseiar a Escribir Relatos Históricos? Elaboración de dos secuencias didicticas y evaluación de su impacto en alumnos de la escuela primaria. Aula de innovación educativa, nº 2, p. 23-28, 1992.

DOLZ, J.; PASQUIER, A.; BRONCKART, J.-P. L’acquisition des discours: émergence d’une compétence ou apprentissage de capacités langagières? Études de Linguistique Appliquée, nº. 102, p. 23-37, 1993.

DOLZ, J.; ROSAT, M. C.; SCHNEUWLY, B. Elaboration et Evaluation de Deux S6quences Didactiques Relatives Trois Types de Textes. Francais aujourd'hui, nº 92, p. 37-47, 1991.

DOLZ, J.; SCHNEUWLY, B. Gêneros em expressão oral e escrita – elementos para reflexões sobre uma experiência suíça (francófona). In: DOLZ, J.; SCHNEUWLY, B. Gêneros orais e escritos na escola. Trad. e Org. Roxane Rojo e Glais Sales Cordeiro. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, p. 41-70, 2004.

FELTON, M.; KUHN, D. The development of argumentive discourse skills. Discourse Processes, 2001, p. 135-153, 2001.

FRANÇOIS, F. Dialogue, discussion et argumentation au début de la scolarité. In: Pratiques, nº 28, p. 83-94, 1980.

GOLDER, C. Justification et négociation en situation monogérée et polygérée dans les discours argumentatifs, In: Enfance, tome 46, n°1-2, p. 99-112, 1992.

HAMPLE, D. Arguing skill. In: GREENE, J. O.; BURLESON, B. R. (Eds.). Handbook of communication and social interaction skills. p. 439-478, 2003.

KUHN, D. The Skills of Argument. New York: Cambridge University, 1991.

KUHN, D.; UDELL, W. The development of argument skills. Child Development, nº 74, p. 1245-1260, 2003.

LEONTEV, A. N. The problem of activity in psychology. In: WERTSCH, J. V. (Ed.). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc. p. 37-61, 1981.

O’KEEFE, D. J. Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association, nº 13, p. 121-128, 1977.

PERELMAN, C.; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, L. Tratado da argumentação – A Nova Retórica. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1996 [1958].

PLANTIN, C. (2005) A argumentação: história, teorias, perspectivas. Tradução de Marcos Marcionilo. São Paulo: Parábola, 2008.

ROSAT, M. C. A propos de la réalisation orale et écrite d’un texte argumentatif. In: Etudes de Linguistique Appliquée, nº 87, p. 37-50, 1991.

SCHNEUWLY, B. Didactique de l'tcrit en Francais Langue Maternelle: une approche Experimentale. In: Acquisition et Enseignement/Apprentissage des Langues (ed.), par Laboratoire de Linguistique et Didactique des Langues Etrangeres et Maternelles. LIDILEM, Grenoble, 511-518, 1992.

ALTON, D. N. Dialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation, nº 3, p. 169-184, 1989.

WENZEL, J. W. Perspectives on argument: Twenty years later. Paper presented at the American Forensic Association. National Communication Association Summer Conference on Argumentation, Alta, UT, 1999.

WENZEL, J. W. Three perspectives on argument: Rhetoric, dialectic e logic. In: TRAPP, R.; SCHUETZ, J. (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland, p. 9-26, 1990.

WENZEL, J. W. Perspective on argument. In: RHODES, J. & NEWELL, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the summer Conference on Argumentation. Washington, DC: Speech Communication Association. p. 112-133, 1980.

WENZEL, J. W. Jurgen Habermas and the dialectical perspective on argumentation. Journal of the American Forensic Association, nº 16, p. 83-94, 1979.

Published

2022-03-19

How to Cite

Lima, S. F. A. ., & Piris, E. L. . (2022). THE NOTION OF ARGUMENTATIVE CAPACITY IN DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES FOR THE STUDY OF ARGUMENTATION. fólio - Revista De Letras, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.22481/folio.v13i2.9324