PHENOMENOLOGY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INNOVATIVE STYLE FOR MANAGING A MODERN EDUCATIONAL LYCEUM

Andrey Ivanovich Shutenko; Anastasia  Koreneva; Inna   Ryzhkova; Larisa  Morina; Alexander Apykhtin; Galina  Romanova

doi:10.22481/rpe.v16i43.6841

Authors

Andrey Ivanovich Shutenko Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov – Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-3660
Anastasia Koreneva Murmansk Arctic State University – Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4901-4927
Inna Ryzhkova Murmansk Arctic State University, Murmansk, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3372-020X
Larisa Morina St. Petersburg State University – Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-1265
Alexander Apykhtin St. Petersburg State University – Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-3533
Galina Romanova Academy of Public Administration, Moscow Region – Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3017-8999

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/rpe.v16i43.6841

Keywords:

Educational lyceum , Innovative style of management , Model of innovative lyceum management

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present the characteristics, content and logic of the development of an innovative managerial style among the directors of educational lyceums in modern Russia. The study reveals the specific features of this management style, which in general boils down to manager’s ability to promote the educational space of the Lyceum to the state of a dynamically developing system that responding to modern requirements for training specialists of innovative economies. As a key criterion for the development of an innovative managerial style, the authors considered the ability of a manager to make a personal contribution to instilling innovation. This criterion made it possible to identify the growth levels of the innovative style of managing the lyceum (reproductive, adaptive, locally-modeling, system-modeling, innovative-creative). The study developed a model for providing innovative managerial activities of the lyceum’s director, which is aimed at the formation of constructive leadership potential and a dynamic "Self-concept" of management. The logic of an innovative managerial style formation is revealed, which consists of three stages: the reflective stage, the identification stage, the stage of professional self-actualization. As a result of applying this logic in the research work, the managers of the experimental group developed better tolerance and flexibility of their position, increased creativity, the ability to withstand prolonged psycho-emotional stress, they better control themselves, the situation and communication, faster made the necessary decisions, showed self-confidence and ability exert managerial and pedagogical influence, ability to manage the social situation, bear responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Andrey Ivanovich Shutenko, Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov – Russia

Ph.D. of Pedagogy, Senior Scientific Fellow, Institute of Economics and Management, Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov, Belgorod, Russia.

Anastasia Koreneva , Murmansk Arctic State University – Russia

Doctor of Pedagogy, Professor, Department of Philology and Media Communications, Murmansk Arctic State University, Murmansk, Russia.

Inna Ryzhkova, Murmansk Arctic State University, Murmansk, Russia

Ph.D. of Pedagogy, Head of Scientific Work and International Cooperation Department, Murmansk Arctic State University, Murmansk, Russia.

Larisa Morina, St. Petersburg State University – Russia

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Department of Cultural Studies, Philosophy of Culture and Aesthetics, St. Petersburg State University. St. Petersburg, Russia.

Alexander Apykhtin, St. Petersburg State University – Russia

Ph.D. Philosophy, Senior lecturer, Department of Cultural Studies, Philosophy of Culture and Aesthetics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia

Galina Romanova, Academy of Public Administration, Moscow Region – Russia

Ph.D. of Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Department of educational systems, Academy of Public Administration, Moscow Region, Russia.

References

DERKACH, A.A. (2004). Akmeologic basis of development of professionalism. Moscow-Voronezh. 750 p.

DIMMOCK, C. (Ed.) (1993). School-based management and school effectiveness. Abingdon: Routledge.

DIESTERWEG, A. (1956). Selected pedagogical essays. Moscow: Uchpedgiz. 374 p.

DRUCKER, P. (2007). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. Butterworth-Heinemann.

GUILE, D. & GRIFFITHS, T. (2001). Learning through work experience. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 113–131.

FAYOL, H. (1949). General and Industrial Management. Translated by C. Storrs, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, London.

HOFFMAN, A. & SPANGEHL, S. (Eds). (2011). Innovation in Higher Education: Igniting the Spark for Success. American Council on Education, Rowman & Little field Publishers Inc., Lanham, MD.

IACOCCA, L. & WHITNEY, C. (2008). Where Have All the Leaders Gone? New York/ London/ Toronto/ Sydney: Scribner.

JERSILD, A.T. (1955). When teachers face themselves. Oxford, England: Bureau of Publications, Teachers Co.

KLIMOV, E.A. (1998). Introduction to the psychology of labor: Introduction to the psychology of labor: a textbook for high schools. Moscow: Culture and Sports: UNITI. 343p.

LAMBERT, L., WALKER, D., ZIMMERMAN, D. P., COOPER, J. E., LAMBERT, M. D., GARDNER, M. E., & SZABO, M. (2002). The constructivist leader (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

LEWIN, K., LIPPIT, R. & WHITE, R.K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-301.

MASLOW, A. (1987). Motivation and Personality. N.Y: Addison-Wesley.

MESCON, M.H., ALBERT, M. & KHEDOURI, F. (1985). Management. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers.

PODYMOV, N.A. (1998). Psychological barriers in teaching. Moscow: Prometheus, 239 p.

PONOMAREV, Ya.A. (1976). Creativity psychology and pedagogy. Moscow: Pedagogy. 280 p.

ROGERS, C.R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

ROMANOVA, G. (2020). The Readiness of Leading and Teaching Staff to Develop Students’ Sociocultural Competence in the Inclusive Learning Environment. Pedagogika, 138(2), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2020.138.13

ROMANOVA, G. A., ANANISHNEV, V. M. & DARDA, E. S. (2020). Inclusive education: A path to equal rights. Opcion, 36 (Special Edition 26), 613-628.

RYZHKOVA, I.V. & SERGEEV, A.M. (2010). Specific Features of internationalization of higher education in the framework of the northern dimension. Baltic Region, 3, 24-37.

SALAZAR, P. (2013). High-impact leadership for high- impact school: The actions that matter most. New York, NY: Routledge.

SERDYUKOV, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10 (1), 4-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007

SHOSTROM, E.L. (1974). Manual for the Personal Orientation Inventory. San Diego, California: EdITS/Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

SHUTENKO, A.I., SHUTENKO, E.N., SERGEEV, A.M., RYZHKOVA, I.V., KORENEVA, A.V. & TEGALEVA, T.D. (2018). Socio-cultural Dominants of Higher School Innovation Mission. Espacios, 39(52), 34. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n52/18395234.html

SHUTENKO, E.N. (2015). Motivational and Conceptual Aspects of Student Self-fulfillment in University Education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214(5), 325-331. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815060073.

SHUTENKO, E.N. & SHUTENKO, A.I. (2015). Socio-Сultural Trends in the Development of the Higher School's Innovative Potential. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 214(5), 332-337. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815060103

SHUTENKO, A.I, SHUTENKO, E.N, SERGEEV, A.M., RYZHKOVA, I.V., TALYSHEVA, I.A. & TSAREVA, E.V. (2018). The use of modern ICT to provide students' self-realization in Russian higher school. Espacios, 39(43), 15. http://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n43/18394315.html

SLASTENIN, V.А. & PODYMOVA, L.S. (1997). Pedagogy: innovative activity. Moscow: Magister. 224 p.

STOGDILL, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of the literature. New York: Free Press.