Digital communication processes in the portuguese educational system in pandemic times
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22481/praxisedu.v17i45.8331Keywords:
Network Digital Education, Communication, CollaborationAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is causing changes at different levels and the education sector has not been immune. The social distance that was imposed affected the way of experiencing the pedagogical relationship, with implications for the teaching and learning processes. The notion of physical classroom space has given way to a fluid frontier where digital artefacts occupy a central place, as it was necessary to reinvent a face-to-face culture in a culture mediated by digital. To respond to this transition, teachers had to quickly change and adapt differentiated strategies. Universidade Aberta, in partnership with the Ministry of Education of Portugal, designed and taught a training course for digital teaching in networks, with the objective of promoting, in non-higher education teachers, competences in the area of distance education. This text focuses specifically on the forms of communication between the elements of the educational community created by the schools and whose representatives participated in that course. The data collected comes from the referred training course in which approximately 2300 teachers and principals from 756 clusters and non-clustered schools from all over the country participated. Following a qualitative methodology, based on critical discourse analysis, we focus on the communication dimension evidenced in the final works that took the format of school plans, carried out collaboratively. The analysis made it possible to identify the mechanisms to guarantee the occurrence of communications, to evaluate the effectiveness of the means mobilized and to relate the communicative processes with the feeling of belonging to the educational community.
Downloads
Metrics
References
ABERNATHY, Dixie; THORNBURG, Amy. Theory and application in the design and delivery of engaging online courses: Four key principles that drive student and instructor engagement and success. In: THORNBURG, Amy; ABERNATHY, Dixie; CEGLIE, Rob. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Developing Engaging Online Courses, 2020. Disponível: https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/book/235696. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2020
ALPHIN, Henry; CHAN., Roy; LAVINE, Jennie (eds). The future of accessibility in international higher education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2017.
ALPHONSO, Caroline. The educational world has been turned upside down - Online learning may reshape the classroom. In: The Globe and Mail. 2020. Disponível: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-as-online-learning-rolls-out-education-may-change-forever/. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2020.
BALA, Manju. Use of ICT in higher education. Multidisciplinary Higher Education.: Research, Dynamics & Concepts: Opportunities & Challenges for Sustainable Development, v. 1, n. 1, p. 368-376, 2018.
BATES, Anthony. Teaching in a digital age. Vancouver: Tony Bates Associates, 2015. Disponível: https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/.Acesso em: 20 jul. 2020.
BATES, Anthony. Marshall McLuhan and his relevance to teaching with technology, 2011. Disponível: https://www.tonybates.ca/2011/07/20/marshall-mcluhan-and-his-relevance-to-teaching-with-technology/. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2020.
BECKMAN, Karley; APPS, Tiffani; BENNETT, Sue; LOCKYER, Lori. Conceptualising Technology Practice in Education Using Bourdieu’s Sociology. Learning, Media and Technology, v. 43, n. 2, p. 197-210, 2018.
BENTO, Marco; PEREIRA, Iris; LENCASTRE, José Alberto. Bridging the gap between practitioners and researchers: critical factors in teachers’ professional learning in the era of mobile learning. In: SYLLA, Cristina; BROOKS, Eva (Eds.) Special Issue on Bridgin. Elsevier, 2018. Disponível: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/55300. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2020
BETTINGER, Eric; FOX, Lindsay; LOEB, Susanna; TAYLOR, Eric. Virtual Classrooms: How Online College Courses Affect Student Success. American Economic Review, v. 107, n. 9, p. 2855–2875, Sept., 2017.
CHAUDHARY, Farkhanda; SHAHZADI, Irum; MAHMOOD, Azhar. Comparative study of satisfaction and problems of face to face and online mode of learners. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, v. 4, n. 1, p.10-27, 2019.
CONNELLY, James; MILLER, Paula. Improving learning outcomes for higher education through smart technology. International Journal of Conceptual Structures and Smart Applications (IJCSSA), v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-17, Jan./Jun., 2018.
CRAWFORD, Joseph; BUTLER-HENDERSON, Kerryn; RUDOLPH, Jurgen; GLOWATZ, Matt. COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning (JALT), v. 3, n. 1, 2020.
DATNOW, Amanda; PARK, Vicky. Data-driven leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2019.
DIAS-TRINDADE, Sara; FERREIRA, António Gomes. Digital teaching skills: DigCompEdu Check In as an evolution process from literacy to digital fluency. ICONO14 Revista de comunicación y tecnologías emergentes, v. 18, n. 2, p. 162-187, 2020.
DUARI, Suari; SARKAR, Dhrubasish. Social networking & learning with technology: Modern approaches in educational field. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, v. 5, n. 4, p. 949-954, out./dez., 2018.
FALLERY, Bernard.; RODHAIN, Florence. Quatre approches pour l’analyse de données textuelles: lexicale, linguistique, cognitive, thématique. Montréal. In: 16ème Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique, 2007. Disponível: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00821448/document. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2020.
FINKEL, Alan. Differential learning outcomes for online versus in-class education, a report to Minster of Education, Australia by Australia’s Chief Scientist, 2020.
HEITZ, Christine; LABOISSIERE, Martha; SANGHVI, Saurabh; SARAKATSANNIS, Jimmy. Getting the next phase of remote learning right in higher education. Washington, DC: McKinsey & Company, 2020.
HODGES, Charles; MOORE, Stephanie.; LOCKEE, Barbara; TORREY, Trust; BOND, Aaron. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. 2020. Disponível: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning. Acesso em 20 de julho de 2020.
UNESCO. International Commission on the Futures of Education. Education in a post-COVID world. Paris, Nine ideas for public action, 2020.
LANCKER, Win; PAROLIN, Zachary. COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: a social crisis in the making. The Lancet. Public Health, v. 5, p.243-244, 2020.
MAYS, Nicholas; POPE, Clive. Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ, 311(6997), p. 109-112, 1995.
MARTIN, Florence; BOLLIGER, Doris. Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. Online Learning Journal, v. 22, n. 1, p. 205-222, March, 2018.
MARTINS, Guilherme. Perfil dos Alunos à Saída da Escolaridade Obrigatória. Dec-lei nº 6478/2017, Lisboa: ME, 2018.
MINISTÉRIO DA EDUCAÇÃO Roteiro: 8 Princípios orientadores para a implementação do ensino a distância (E@D) nas escolas. 2020. Disponível: https://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/roteiro_ead_vfinal.pdf. Acesso em 20 de julho de 2020.
MONTEIRO, Angélica; FIGUEIROA, Alcina; COUTO, José. Ambientes Educativos Inovadores: a realidade de escolas portuguesas. Saber e Educar, n. 25, 2018.
MOREIRA, José. António; HENRIQUES, Susana; BARROS, Daniela. Transitando de um ensino remoto emergencial para uma educação digital em rede, em tempos de pandemia. Dialogia, v. 34, p. 351-364, 2020.
MOREIRA, José António. Roteiro 3 – Comunicação no ambiente online. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta, 2020. (CC-BY-NC).
MOREIRA, José António; FERREIRA, António Gomes; ALMEIDA, Ana Cristina. Comparing communities of inquiry of Portuguese higher education students: One for all or one for each? Open Praxis, v. 5, n. 2, Apr./Jun., p.165-178, 2013.
MORTELMANS, Door. Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden, Leuven: Acco, 2009.
MUCCHIELLI, Alex. Dictionnaire des méthodes qualitatives en sciences humaines, Paris: Armand Colin, 2011.
MUCCHIELLI, Roger. L’analyse de contenu des documents et des communications. In: ESF (9 ème édition). Issy-Les-Moulineaux, 2006.
NORTHCOTE, Maria. The same but different: Reframing contemporary online education in higher education towards quality and integrity. In: SMIDT, Esther; LI, Rui. Ensuring quality and integrity in online learning programs. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2019. p. 1-32.
OKADA Alexandra. Ambientes Emergentes para coaprender e co-investigar em rede. E-Book In: VIII International Conference of ICT in Education - Challenges 213. Minho Portugal, 2013.
OKADA, Alexandra. Colearn 2.0 – Coaprendizagem via Comunidades Abertas de Pesquisa, Práticas e Recursos Educacionais. Revista e-curriculum, São Paulo, v. 7, n. 1, 2011.
OLUWAFEMI, Ifetayo; LASEINDE, T. Perception of Quality in Higher Education Institutions: A Logical View from the Literature. In: 2nd International conference on Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED2019): future trends and applications. Proceedings. Munich, 2019, p.1075-1083.
ORAKCI, Senol; AKTAN, Çetin; AKTAN, Osman. Relationships between teachers' professional values, attitudes, and concerns about the profession in Turkey. Educational Research, v. 30, n.2, p. 397-419, 2020.
PURNOMO, Agus; KURNIAWAN, Bayu; ADI, Khofifatu. Expanding Learning Environment Through Mobile Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, v. 15, n. 7, p. 123-130, 2020.
POPE, Clive; ZIEBLAND, Sue; MAYS, Nicholas. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data, BMJ, 320(7227), 2000, p. 114-116.
RAHIM, Emad; BURELL, Darrell. Best Practices and Emerging Trends for Knowledge Based Organizations and Academic Institutions around E-Learning. In: International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society, v. 11, n. 2, 2020, p.16-27.
TERESEVICIENE, Margarita; TREPULE, Elena; DAUKSIENE, Estela; TAMOLIUNE, Giedre; COSTA, Nilza. Are Universities Ready to Recognize Open Online Learning? International Education Studies, v.13, n. 2, p.21-32, 2020. Disponível: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ies/article/view/0/41889. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2020.
VELETSIANOS, George. Learning Online: The Student Experience. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2020.
VUORIKARI, Riina; PUNIE, Yves; CARRETERO GOMEZ Stephanie; VAN DEN BRANDE, Godelieve. DigComp 2.0: the Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: The Concept, 2016.
WILLIAMSON, Ben; EYNON, Rebecca; POTTER, John. Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, v. 45, n. 2, p. 107-114, 2020.
WHITER, Kimberly. A. Strategies for engaging students in the online environment. In: ALQURASHI, Emtinan. Handbook of research on fostering student engagement with instructional technology in higher education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2020, p. 305-326.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; Adapt - remix, transform, and build from the material for any purpose, even commercially. This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Attribution - You must appropriately give credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests that you or your use is endorsed by the licensor.
There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others to make any use permitted by the license.