PRINCIPLES OF HIGHER EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT IN WORKS OF RUSSIAN PHILOSOPHERS AND SCIENTISTS OF 20TH CENTURY

Olga A. Volnyakova; Oleg G. Arapov; Elmira A. Arapova; Denis V. Solodukhin

doi:10.22481/praxisedu.v16i39.6381

Autores/as

Olga A. Volnyakova Russian Technological University – Rússia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8086-1673
Oleg G. Arapov Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) – Rússia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8107-9958
Elmira A. Arapova Russian Technological University – Rússia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9310-5896
Denis V. Solodukhin Russian Technological University – Rússia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-3358

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/praxisedu.v16i39.6381

Palabras clave:

Educación superior, Filosofía de la educación, Pensadores rusos, Nuevo imperativo moral, Universidad, Humanidades

Resumen

Introducción: el artículo está dedicado a la investigación de la educación superior en diversos aspectos, se presentan los resultados de su reconocimiento en el pensamiento científico y filosófico nacional del siglo XX, se detecta la conexión con las tendencias europeas comunes de la escuela superior. Se consideran las opiniones de los filósofos y científicos rusos populares que hicieron su contribución a la base ideológica y los principios de la educación universitaria en Rusia en el siglo XX. Materiales y métodos: los métodos se basan en tradiciones de investigación del conocimiento humano: enfoque filosófico-antropológico de los problemas de la existencia humana, método comparativo de consideración de problemas educativos en relación con diversos contextos culturales e históricos del desarrollo de la existencia humana, método comparativo-histórico. Además de eso se reflejan los métodos de investigación fenomenológica y hermenéutica. Se detectan y comprenden filosóficamente las bases, los contenidos, los objetivos y las metas del sistema educativo, incluida la educación universitaria y la conexión de la educación con las investigaciones reales del ser humano y la sociedad contemporáneos. Resultados de la investigación: se presenta en el artículo que los principales enfoques de la educación y los resultados de su comprensión por parte de los pensadores rusos comprenden la unidad de contenido y resuenan con los problemas reales de su estructura y contenido en términos del mundo moderno, incluida la realidad rusa. Por lo tanto, se confirma la idea de la necesidad de una combinación óptima de conocimiento científico natural, especial y filosófico en el sistema educativo. Tal enfoque permite desarrollar la educación en términos de valores humanitarios, facilita la formación de la personalidad moral y espiritualmente orientada y socialmente responsable del especialista, ejerciendo una visión del mundo razonable. Discusión y conclusión: los resultados recibidos pueden usarse para ejercer los principios del desarrollo de la educación superior en términos de desafíos contemporáneos basados en el principio de sucesión y el mantenimiento de las mayores tradiciones culturales, y también para la planificación estratégica de los programas educativos de la Universidad.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Olga A. Volnyakova, Russian Technological University – Rússia

Candidate of Philosophy, Professor, Russian Technological University, Institute of Innovative Technologies and Public Administration, Department of Social & Humanitarian Sciences MIREA (78, Vernadskogo Pr., Moscow 119454, Russia).

Oleg G. Arapov, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) – Rússia

Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Social Philosophy, Moscow

Elmira A. Arapova, Russian Technological University – Rússia

Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Russian Technological University, Institute of Innovative Technologies and Public Administration, Department of Social & Humanitarian Sciences MIREA (78, Vernadskogo Pr., Moscow 119454, Russia).

Denis V. Solodukhin, Russian Technological University – Rússia

Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Russian Technological University, Institute of Innovative Technologies and Public Administration, Department of Social & Humanitarian Sciences MIREA (78, Vernadskogo Pr., Moscow 119454, Russia).

Citas

Arapov, O., Arapova, A., Volnyakova, O., Ivanova, A., Krivolapova, J., & Solodukhin, D. (2016). Philosophy as Rational Knowledge. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(46), 449-460.
Arapov, O.G., Arapova, E.A., Volnyakova, O.A., & Solodukhin, D.V. (2018). Philosophical Problems of Education in the Russian Natural Scientific Thought. Russian Technological Journal, 6(6), 84-100.
Bendixen, C., & Jacobsen, J.C. (2017) Nullifying Quality: The Marketisation of Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, 23(1), 20-34.
Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Mas-Machuca, M., & Marimon, F. (2018). Is Research Mediating the Relationship between Teaching Experience and Student Satisfaction? Studies in Higher Education, 43(6), 973-988.
Conceição, C.P., Ávila, P., Coelho, A.R., & Costa, A.F. (2019). European Action Plans for Science–Society Relations: Changing Buzzwords, Changing the Agenda. Minerva, 58, 1-24.
Faber, C., Hardin, E., Klein-Gardner, S., & Benson, L. (2014). Development of Teachers as Scientists in Research Experiences for Teachers Programs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(7), 785-806.
Gagaev, A.A, & Gagaev, P.A. (2008). Russian Philosophical and Pedagogical Teachings of the XVIII – XX Centuries. Penza.
Gharawi, M.A., Bidin, A., & Choo, K.A. (2020). Malaysian Learners’ Preferences-Based Profile Model towards Adaptive Massive Open Online Courses. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(1). http://jsju.org/index.php/journal/article/view/480
Halversen, C., & Tran, L.U. (2010). Communicating Ocean Sciences to Informal Audiences: A Scientist-Educator Partnership to Prepare the Next Generation of Scientists. The New Educator, 6(3-4), 265-279.
Hammarfelt, B., de Rijcke, S., & Wouters, P. (2017). From Eminent Men to Excellent Universities: University Rankings as Calculative Devices. Minerva, 55, 391-411.
Hessen, S.I. (1995). Introduction to Applied Philosophy. Moscow: Shkola-Press.
Hicks, D., & Holbrook, J.B. (2019). A Cartography of Philosophy’s Engagement with Society. Minerva, 58, 25-45.
Ilyin, I.A. (2017). The Path to Evidence. Мoscow: EKSMO-Press.
Jusuf, E., Herwany, A., Kurniawan, P.S., & Gunardi, A. (2020). Sustainability Concept Implementation in Higher Education Institutions of Indonesia. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(1). http://jsju.org/index.php/journal/article/view/488
Lazutina, T.V., Tempel, Yu.A., & Tempel, O.A. (2017). Philosophy’s Role as a Form of Worldview in Mastering Competences by Students of the Technical Specialisations in the Modern Russia’s Higher Education System. Integration of Education, 21(1), 19-34.
Lobanova, O.B. (2007). Russian Pedagogical Thought of the Late XIX – Early XX Century on the Pedagogical Experience Core. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 1, 54-56.
Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). Ethics in the Supervisory Relationship: Supervisors' and Doctoral Students' Dilemmas in the Natural and Behavioural Sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 42(2), 232-247.
Mamardashvili, M. (1990a). Science and Culture. Moscow: Progress.
Mamardashvili, M. (1990b). Thought in Culture. Moscow: Progress.
Margolis, J. (2007). Improving Relationships between Mentor Teachers and Student Teachers: Engaging in Pedagogy of Explicitness. The New Educator, 3(1), 75-94.
Masuda, A. (2014). “They’re Shocked That I’m Doing Research!”: Supporting an Early Career Teacher’s Inquiry in Teaching Informative Writing. The New Educator, 10(3), 201-221.
McLean, N., & Price, L. (2019). Identity Formation among Novice Academic Teachers – A Longitudinal Study. Studies in Higher Education, 44(6), 990-1003.
Mendeleev, D.I. (1905). The Cherished Thoughts. Moscow: Mysl.
Morrison, J., & Estes, J. (2007). Using Scientists and Real-World Scenarios in Professional Development for Middle School Science Teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(2), 165-184.
National Research Council. (1996). The Role of Scientists in the Professional Development of Science Teachers. Washington, District of Columbia: National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2009). Learning Science in Informal Environments. People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, District of Columbia: The National Academies Press.
Ryan, M., Taylor, M., Barone, A., Pesca, L.D., Durgana, S., Ostrowski, K., Piccirillo, T., & Pikaard, K. (2017). Teacher as Researcher, Teacher as Scholar, and Teacher as Leader. The New Educator, 13(2), 102-116.
Saxman, L.J., Gupta, P., & Steinberg, R.N. (2010). CLUSTER: University-Science Center Partnership for Science Teacher Preparation. The New Educator, 6(3-4), 280-296.
Scoles, J., Huxham, M., Sinclair, K., Lewis, C., Jung, J., & Dougall, E. (2019). The Other Side of a Magic Mirror: Exploring Collegiality in Student and Staff Partnership Work. Teaching in Higher Education. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13562517.2019.1677588
Ukhtomsky, A.A. (2008). The Face of Another Person. Saint Petersburg: Ivan Limbakh Publishing House.
Vasilevska, D., Rivza, B., Alekneviciene, V., & Parlińska, A. (2017). Analysis of the Demand for Distance Education at Eastern and Central European Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(1), 106-116.
Vernadsky, V.I. (1993). Autotrophy of Mankind. Russian Cosmism: Anthology of Philosophical Thought. Moscow: Pedagogy-Press.
Vernadsky, V.I. (2010). Selected Works. Moscow: Rosspen.
Williams, R.J.P. (1991). Science in Universities: Teaching, Research and Autonomy. Studies in Higher Education, 16(1), 15-22.