Living Lab Mais Juntas: a universidade extensionista como orquestradora da cocriação de inovação social

Larissa Bolzan; Daniela Mattos Fernandes

doi:10.22481/ccsa.v20i36.12309

Authors

Larissa Bolzan Federal University of Pelotas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3257-7096
Daniela Mattos Fernandes Federal University of Pelotas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/ccsa.v20i36.12309

Keywords:

Social innovation, University extension, Living Lab

Abstract

This article had the objective of evidence the role of extensionist actions of a public university in the process of co-creation of social innovations. For this purpose, the Living Lab Mais Juntas served as a unit of analysis to explore these extensionist actions as an object of study. The method for developing this work was research. In general, this research showed that through extension actions the public university is capable of filling institutional gaps in society, coordinating and leading (or orchestrating) methodologies for co-creation of social innovations, as observed in the Living Lab Mais Juntas – implemented by the unified Project with an emphasis on extension Mais Juntas of UFPel. It is also worth highlight that the use of the Design Sprint co-creation method enabled the mobility of knowledge, the maintenance of network stability and horizontal communication, the construction of the relational capital between actors, in addition to the successful co-creation of three social technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Larissa Bolzan, Federal University of Pelotas

Doutora em Administração pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Professora na Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel).

Daniela Mattos Fernandes, Federal University of Pelotas

Mestranda em Ciências Ambientais na Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel).

References

AGOSTINI, M. R. O Processo de Inovação Social Como Resposta aos VaziosInstitucionais: Uma análise multidimensional em diferentes contextossociais. 2017. Tese (Doutorado em Administração) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos.

ALMIRALL, E.; WAREHAM, J. Living Labs: Arbiters of Mid - and Ground - Level Innovation. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, v. 23, n. 1, p. 87-102, 2011.

ARROYO, D. M. P.; ROCHA, M. S. P. D. M. L. Meta-Avaliação de Uma Extensão Universitária: Estudo de Caso. Avaliação, Campinas, v. 15, n. 2, p. 135-161, 2010.

BERG, A. V. D.; DEWAR, B.; SMITS, C.; JUKEMA, J.. Experiences of older adults and undergraduate students in co-creating age-friendly services in an educational living lab. International Practice Development Journal. v. 9, n. 2, 2019.

BERGVALL-KAREBORN, B.; STAHLBROST, A. Living Lab: an opne and citizen-centric approach for innovation. International Jounal of Innovation and Regional Development, v. 1, n. 4, 2009.

BITENCOURT DA SILVA CORREIO, S.; BITENCOURT CORREIO, C. C.. Orquestração de redes de inovação constituídas com o conceito de living lab para o desenvolvimento de inovações sociais. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, v. 11, n. 2, 2019.

BITENCOURT, C.; MARCONATTO, D.; BARIN CRUZ, L. & RAUFFLET, E.. Introduction to special edition social innovation: researching, defining and theorizing social innovation. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v. 17, n. 6, p. 14-19, 2016.

BOTH, L. M.; FAVARETTO, T. C.; FREITAS, L. H. M. Cycle of Violence in Women Victims of Domestic Violence: Qualitative Analysis of OPD 2 Interview. Brain and Behavior, Massachusetts, v. 9, n. 01430, p. 1-13, 2019.

BOUSBIAT, H; KLEMENJAK, C; LEITNER, G; ELMENREICH, W.. Augmenting an Assisted Living Lab with Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring. IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC). 2020.

CALLARI, T. C.; MOODY, L.; SAUNDERS, J.; WARD, G.; HOLLIDAY, N.; WOODLEY, J. Exploring Participation Needs and Motivational Requirements When Engaging Older Adults in an Emerging Living Lab. Technology Innovation Management Review. v. 9, n. 3, 2019.

CASTRO, L. M. C. A Universidade, a Extensão Universitária e a Produção de Conhecimentos Emancipadores. Biblioteca Biomédica, Rio de Janeiro, p. 185, 2004.

CHRISTENSEN, M. H.; LI, R.; PINSON, P. Demand Side Management of Heat in Smart Homes: Living-Lab Experiments. Energy, Holanda, v. 195, n. 116993, p. 1-10, 2020.

CORTÉS, D.; GIL, D.; AZORÍN, J. Fire Science Living Lab for Flashover Prediction. Proceedings. v. 31, n. 1, 2019.

SILVA, W. P. Extensão Universitária: Um Conceito em Construção. Extensão & Sociedade, Natal, v. 2, p. 21-32, 2020.

ENGEL, I. G. Pesquisa-ação. Educar, Curitiba, v. 1, n. 16, p. 181-191, 2000.

EUROPEAN NETWORK OF LIVING LABS. About us. 2020. Acessado em 15 de abr. 2020. Online. Disponível em: https://enoll.org/about-us/

EVANS, J.; JONES, R.; KARVONEN, A.; MILLARD, L.; WENDLER, J. Living labs and coproduction: university campuses as platforms for sustainability science. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. v. 16, p. 1-6, 2015.

FLORIANO, M. D. P.; MATTA, I. B.; MONTEBLANCO, F. L.; ZULIANI, A. L. B. Extensão Universitária: A Percepção de Acadêmicos de Uma Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Em Extensão, Uberlândia, v. 16, n. 1, p. 9-35, 2017.

FOLSTAD, A. Living Labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Idots. v. 10, aug. 2008.

GOOGLE VENTURES. The Design Sprint. GV. 2018. Disponível em: <http://www.gv.com/sprint/>. Acesso em: 30 de maio de 2021.

GUZMAN, J. G.; DEL CARPIO, A. F.; COLOMO-PALACIOS, R.; DIEGO, M.V. Living labs for user-driven innovation: a process reference model. Res. Technol. Manag. v. 56, n. 3, p. 29- 39. 2013.

HAKKARAINEN, L.; HYYSALO, S. How Do We Keep the Living Laboratory Alive? Learning and Conflicts in Living Lab Collaboration. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 16-22, 2013.

HAUKIPURO, L.; VÄINÄMÖ, S. Digital User Involvement in a Multi-Context Living Lab Environment. Technology Innovation Management Review, Itália, v. 9, n. 10, p. 27-37, 2019.

HOSSAIN, M.; LEMINEN, S.; WESTERLUND, M. A Systematic Review of Living Lab Literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, Holanda, v. 213, p. 976-988, 2019.

HUNGER, G.; ROSSI, F.; PEREIRA, J. M.; NOZAKI, J. M. O Dilema Extensão Universitária. Educação em Revista, Belo Horizonte, p. 335-354, 2014.

HYYSALO, S.; HAKKARAINEN, L. What difference does a living lab make? Comparing two health technology innovation projects. CoDesign, v. 10, n. 3, jul. 2014.

JARVENPAA, S.L.; WERNICK, A.. Open innovation networks: the evolution of bureaucratic control. In: Collaborative Communities of Firms. Springer, New York, NY, p. 9-33, 2012.

JUUJÄRVI, S.; PESSO, K. Actor Roles in an Urban Living Lab: What Can We Learn from Suurpelto, Finland? (November 2013). Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 3, n. 11, p. 22-27, 2013.

KERO, K. M.; PUURONEN, A. H et al. Usability of Two Brief Questions As a Screening Tool for Domestic Violence and Effect of #MeToo on Prevalence of Self-Reported Violence. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Amsterdam, v. 1, n. 225, p. 92-97, 2020.

KIM, Y et al. Development of a Living Lab for a Mobile-Based Health Program for Korean- Chinese Working Women in South Korea: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, Toronto, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2020.

LEMINEN, S.; WESTERLUND, M.. A framework for understanding the diferente research avenues of living labs. Int. J. Technol. Market. v. 11, n .4, p. 399-420. 2016.

MAÇASTENA, A. Gender-Based Violence in Kosovo. Acta Universitatis Danubius, Romênia, v. 15, n. 1, p. 118-135, 2019.

MCKAY, J.; MARSHALL, P. The dual imperatives of action research. Information Technology & People. v. 14, n. 1, p. 46-59, 2001. Disponível em: <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.444.4042&rep=rep1&type=pdf.>. Acesso em: 23 abr. 2021.

MINAYO, M.C.S. Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. Petrópolis: Vozes, 18 ed., 2001.

MONTERROSA, A. E. How Race and Gender Stereotypes Influence Help-Seeking for Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Universidade de Washington, EUA, p.1- 22, 2019.

MOORE, T.; HORNE, R.; DOYON, A. Housing Industry Transitions: An Urban Living Lab in Melbourne, Australia. Urban Policy and Research, v. 38, n. 2, 2020.

O’LEARY, K. D.; KAR, H. L. Patterns of Psychological Aggression, Dominance, and Jealousy within Marriage. Journal of Family Violence, Nova Iorque, v. 28, p. 109–119, 2013.

PINTO, M. M.; FONSECA, L. P. Profundizando la comprensión de los Living Labs de Brasil. CTS-Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, v. 8, n. 23, p. 231-247, 2013.

POULSON, D.; NICOLLE, C. A.; GALLEY, M. Review of the current status of research on smart homes and other domestic assistive technologies in support of the TAHI trials. Loughborough: Loughborough University Additional Information, 2002. Metadata Record. Disponível em: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/1030. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023.

RODRIGUES, A. L. L.; PRATA, M. S.; BATALHA, T. B. S.; COSTA, C. L. N. A.; NETO, I. F. P. Contribuições da Extensão Universitária na Sociedade. Cadernos de Graduação - Ciências Humanas e Sociais, Aracaju, v. 1, n. 16, p. 141-148, 2013.

SERRANO, R. M. S. M. Conceitos de extensão universitária: um diálogo com Paulo Freire, p. 1-15, 2012.

SKER, I.; FLORICIC, T. Living Lab – Creative Environment and Thinking Techniques for Tourism Development. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, v. 18, n. 2, p. 258- 270, 2020.

STAKE, R.E. Pesquisa Qualitativa: estudando como as coisas funcionam. Penso. 2011.

THEES, H.; PECHLANER, H.; OLBRICH, N.; SCHUHBERT, A. The Living Lab as a Tool to Promote Residents’Participation in Destination Governance. Sustainability, Basiléia, v. 12, n. 1120, p. 1-27, 2020.

VIDMAR, M. Agile Space Living Lab – The Emergence of a New High-Tech Innovation Paradigm. Space Policy, Reino Unido, v. 49, 2019.