CONSTRUCCIONES DE TESAUROS DE LA AUTORREALIZACIÓN Y EL BIENESTAR PSICOLÓGICO DE LOS ESTUDIANTES EN LA EDUCACIÓN UNIVERSITARIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22481/praxisedu.v17i44.6694Palabras clave:
Autorealización de los estudiantes, Análisis de tesauros, Marcadores semánticos, Dominantes narrativosResumen
El propósito de este artículo es revelar las manifestaciones personales y las confirmaciones de la autorrealización de los estudiantes para determinar su bienestar psicológico en el proceso de educación en la escuela superior rusa. En el estudio, se utilizó el método de análisis de tesauros, a través del cual los autores procesaron las respuestas de los estudiantes en una encuesta especial. Este método permitió distinguir los marcadores semánticos de la autorrealización de los estudiantes con su posterior agrupación en tres tesauros sentido: el tesauro de la preparación para la autorrealización; el tesauro de las acciones de autorrealización; el tesauro de las activadoras de autorrealización. De acuerdo con los datos de la encuesta, el estudio identificó tres narrativas dominantes del bienestar psicológico de los estudiantes en de aprendizaje, como: la implicación del ego en el proceso educativo, la divulgación versátil de las capacidades personales y la aceptación en la comunidad universitaria. Estos dominantes formaron la base de criterios de un estudio especial para determinar el nivel de autorrealización de los estudiantes y su bienestar psicológico en la educación universitaria. Los resultados resumidos mostraron que el proceso de educación universitaria proporciona las condiciones y oportunidades necesarias para la autorrealización de la mayoría de los estudiantes entrevistados durante este estudio.
Descargas
Citas
ASSAGIOLI, R. (1961). Self-Realization and Psychological Disturbances. Greenville, DE: Psychosynthesis Research Foundation.
BAUDRILLARD, J. (1998). The Consumer Society. Myths Structures. London, Thousand Oaks; New York, Delhi: SAGE Publications.
BAUER, J.J., MCADAMS, D.P., & PALS, J.L. (2008). Narrative identity and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 81–104.
BAUMAN, Z. (2001). The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BRADBURN, N. (1969). The Structure of Psychological Weil-Being. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co. 320p.
CONLEY, D. (2005). College knowledge: What it really takes for students to succeed and what we can do to get them ready. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
DOROSHENKO, Y.A., SHUTENKO, A.I., SHUTENKO, E.N., OSPISHCHEV, P.I. (2016). The conditions and the mechanism of students’ self-realization in activity of small innovative enterprises. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(4), 909-914.
DECI, E.L, RYAN, R.M. (2008). Self-Determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian psychology, 49(3), 182-185.
FEATHERSTONE, M. (2007). Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. 2nd. ed. London: Sage Publ. 232 p.
GEWIRTH, A. (1998). Self- fulfillment. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 235 p.
GREENFIELD, P. (2000). What Psychology can do for anthropology, or why anthropology took postmodernism on the chin? American Anthropologist, 102(3), 564-576. https://www.jstor.org/stable/683412
ILINSKIY, I.M. (2010). Education for the Purpose of Endarkenment. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 1, 3-30. http://www.zpu-journal.ru/zpu/contents/2010/1/Ilinskiy/
KUPAVTSEV, T.S. (2013). The essence, content and specificity of self-improvement of the Russian Ministry of the internal Affairs personnel in the professional education. Professional education in the modern world, 3(9), 129-136.
KUPAVTSEV, T.S. (2015). Characteristics of the subject of self-improvement in the system of professional education of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. Higher education today, 1, 55-59.
LANDRY, L.Y. (2000). Marx and the Postmodern Debates: An Agenda for Critical Theory. London: Praeger Publishing. 232 p.
LEONTYEV, D.A. (2002). Self-actualization as the driving force of personal development. In: D. Leontyev D.A. (Ed.). Modern psychology of motivation. Moscow, 13-46.
LI, Y. (2017) Study on Psychological Health Problems and Countermeasures of University Student. Creative Education, 8, 1795-1802.
LUKOV, VAL.A., LUKOV, VL.A. (2004). Thesaurus Approach in the Humanities. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 1, 93-100.
MASLOW, A.H. (1987). Motivation and Personality. N.Y: Addison-Wesley. 293 p.
MASLOW, A.H. (1950). Self-Actualized People: The Study of Psychological Health. Personality, Symposium, 1, 11–34.
MCADAMS, D.P. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story. In O.P. John, R.W. Robins, & L.A. Pervin (Eds.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 242-262). N.Y.: Guilford Press.
MIQUELON, P., VALLERAND, R.J. (2006). Goal motives, well-being, and physical health: Happiness and self-fulfillment as psychological resources under challenge. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 259-272.
PETERS, R.S. (1961). «Mental health» as an educational aim. Paper read before Philosophy of Education Society. Harvard University, March.
ROGERS, C.R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1961.
ROGERS, C.R. (1963). The concept of the fully functioning person. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 17-26.
ROMANOVA, G.A. (2020a). The Readiness of Leading and Teaching Staff to Develop Students’ Sociocultural Competence in the Inclusive Learning Environment. Pedagogika, 138(2), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2020.138.13
ROMANOVA, G.A. (2020b). Inclusive educational environment in students’ social-cultural competence development. Proceedings of the First International Volga Region Conference on Economics, Humanities and Sports (FICEHS 2019), Kazan: Atlantis Press. 564–569. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200114.131
RYAN, R.M., DECI, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychology, 55, 68-78.
RYAN, R.M., DECI, E.L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.
RYAN, R.M., FREDERICK, C.M. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529-565.
RYFF, C. D., SINGER, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28.
SELIGMAN, M., CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.
SHUTENKO, E.N. (2014). Self-realization of students in modern university as the humanitarian problem of youth socialization. Perspectives of Science and Education, 1(7), 149-152. https://pnojournal.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/pdf_140126.pdf
SHUTENKO E.N., SHUTENKO A.I. (2015). Socio-Сultural Trends in the Development of the Higher School's Innovative Potential. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214(5), 332-337. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.655.
SHUTENKO, E.N, SHUTENKO, A.I., KANISHCHEVA, M.A., KOVTUN, J.J., LOKTEVA, A.V., DEREVYANKO, J.P. (2019). Subjective factors and psychological characteristics of students’ self-realization as a reflection of their psychological well-being in the process of university learning. Revista Espacios, 40(29), 24. http://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n29/19402924.html
STIPEK, D. (Ed.). (1993). Motivation to Learn: From Theory to Practice (2d ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
TARABAEVA, V.B., SHUTENKO, E.N., SHUTENKO, A.I., PCHELKINA, E.P., SHARAPOV, A.O. (2016). The Personal-Focused Dimension of Students’ Self-Fulfillment in the University Education. The Social Sciences, 11(10), 2488-2493 http://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=sscience.2016.2488.2493
TOMLINSON, T. (Ed.). (1993). Motivating Students to Learn: Overcoming Barriers to High Achievement. Berkeley, CA.: McCutchan Pub. Corp.
WHITE, M. & EPSTON, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton.
YOUNG, K. (1952). Personality and Problems of Adjustment. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Práxis Educacional

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Você é livre para:
Compartilhar - copia e redistribui o material em qualquer meio ou formato; Adapte - remixe, transforme e construa a partir do material para qualquer propósito, mesmo comercialmente. Esta licença é aceitável para Obras Culturais Livres. O licenciante não pode revogar essas liberdades, desde que você siga os termos da licença.
Sob os seguintes termos:
Atribuição - você deve dar o crédito apropriado, fornecer um link para a licença e indicar se alguma alteração foi feita. Você pode fazer isso de qualquer maneira razoável, mas não de uma forma que sugira que você ou seu uso seja aprovado pelo licenciante.
Não há restrições adicionais - Você não pode aplicar termos legais ou medidas tecnológicas que restrinjam legalmente outros para fazer qualquer uso permitido pela licença.