Sociolinguistic perception analyses: contributions to Theoretical Linguistics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22481/el.v23i1.16884Keywords:
sociolinguistics, Social evaluation, PerceptionAbstract
This paper aims to describe the contributions of studies on the perception of sociolinguistic variation to the development of Theoretical Linguistics. To achieve this, we discuss the concepts of perception, attitude, and social evaluation, aiming to delineate the scope of each one. Additionally, we review studies produced within this theoretical and methodological perspective, highlighting their contributions and justifying their relevance to understanding the mechanism of change. Finally, we describe the role of perception in providing evidence for the development of a representational model. With this, the complementarity between methods and objectives of production and perception studies is demonstrated, contributing to the enhancement of research and the consequent expansion of knowledge about the nature of the linguistic compentence.
Downloads
References
BYBEE, J. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge, 2001.
CARGILE, A. C. Speaker evaluation measures of language attitudes: evidence of information-processing effects. Language awareness, v. 11, p. 178-191, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410208667055
CASASANTO, L. S. What do Listeners Know about Sociolinguistic Variation?
University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, v. 15, n. 2, p. 37-49, 2010. Disponível em: https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/44744. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2025.
DRAGER, K.; KIRTLEY, M. J. Awareness, salience, and stereotypes in Exemplar-Based Models of speech production and perception. In: BABEL, A. M. Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. p. 1-24
FREITAG, R. M. K. Effects of the linguistics processing: palatals in brazilian portuguese and the sociolinguistic monitor. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, v. 25, n. 2, p. 19-30, 2020. Disponível em: https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/45256. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2025.
GARRET, P. Attitudes to language. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
HOUAISS, A. Percepção. In: Dicionário eletrônico Houaiss da língua portuguesa. Versão 3.0. Objetiva, 2009.
LABOV, W. Padrões sociolinguísticos. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2008 [1972].
LABOV, W.; ASH, S., RAVINDRANATH, M., WELDON, T., BARANOWSKI, M.; NAGY, N. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics, Oxford/Malden, v. 15, n. 4, p. 431-463, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00504.x
LADEGAARD, H. J. Language attitudes and sociolinguistic behaviour: exploring attitude-behaviour relations in language. Journal of Sociolinguistics. Oxford/Malden, v. 4, n. 2, p. 214-233, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00112
LEVON, E. O que soa “gay”? Prosódia, interpretação e julgaments da fala masculina. Todas as letras, São Paulo, v. 18, n. 2, p. 165-181, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15529/1980-6914/letras.v18n2p165-181
MIRANDA, L. S.; MORAES, J. A.; RILLIARD, A. Percepção audiovisual da entoação modal do português do Brasil. Gradus: revista brasileira de fonologia de laboratório, Curitiba, v. 5, n. 1, p. 47-70, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47627/gradus.v5i1.148
OPPENHEIM, B. An exercise in attitude measurement. In: BREAKWELL, G. M.; FOOT, H.; GILMOUR, R. Social psychology: a practical manual. London: Palgrave, 1982. p. 38-56
OUSHIRO, L. Identidade na pluralidade: avaliação, produção e percepção linguística na cidade de São Paulo. 2015. Tese (Doutorado em Letras) – Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/T.8.2015.tde-15062015-104952
PIERREHUMBERT, J. Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. In: BYBEE, J.; HOPPER, P. Frequency effects and the emergency of linguistic structure Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001. p. 1-19
POEPPEL, D.; COGAN, G. B.; DAVIDESCO, I.; FLINKER, A. Speech perception: a perspective from lateralization, motorization and oscillation. In: The Oxford handbook of Neurolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019. p. 647-675
RICKFORD, J. R. African American Vernacular English: Features, Evolution, Educational Implications. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
SILVA, H. C.; AGUILERA, V. A. O poder de uma diferença: um estudo sobre crenças e atitudes linguísticas. Alfa, São Paulo, v. 58, n. 3, p. 703-723, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5794-1409-8
SQUIRES, L. Processing Grammatical Differences: Perceiving versus Noticing. In: BABEL, A. M. Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. p. 80-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139680448.006
WEINREICH, U.; LABOV, W.; HERZOG, M. Fundamentos empíricos para uma teoria da mudança linguística. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2006 [1968].
WOLFRAM, W. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1969.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Language Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Estudos da Língua(gem) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in the journal Estudos da Língua (gem) agree with the following terms:
The journal Estudos de Língua(gem) maintains the copyrights of the contributions published. These rights include the publication of the contribution and make its content available for free through the portal.
