Tensions between generative ai principles and practice in equity education

John Pike; Tamra Ulpen

doi:10.22481/praxisedu.v21i52.17104

Autores

John Pike University of South Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5998-2518
Tamra Ulpen University of South Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9671-0554

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/praxisedu.v21i52.17104

Palavras-chave:

inteligência artificial generativa, equidade, assemblagem, avaliação, ensino superior

Resumo

Muitas estratégias foram propostas para responder à inteligência artificial generativa (genAI) no ensino superior desde o lançamento público do ChatGPT, mas muitos desafios permanecem para o ensino, a aprendizagem e a avaliação. Este ensaio conceitual explora as tensões que surgem com a introdução da genAI no ensino superior, com foco nas implicações para os resultados de equidade. Essas tensões incluem a necessidade de ensinar habilidades acadêmicas fundamentais juntamente com a literacia crítica em IA, os desafios de reformulação da avaliação e o impacto da genAI na produção do conhecimento. Ao conceber a genAI como um "assemblage" de tecnologias, contextos sociopolíticos e pedagógicos, fundamentos epistemológicos, entre outros, este ensaio argumenta que existem aspectos fundamentais de como a genAI funciona como tecnologia, juntamente com as particularidades dos contextos nos quais é introduzida, que a tornam uma ameaça potencial aos resultados de equidade. Combater essa ameaça potencial não deve ser deixado a educadores individuais, mas requer liderança institucional e setorial.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

John Pike, University of South Australia

Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of South Australia. Lecturer at University of South Australia College. Co-facilitator of the GenAI Special Interest Group, National Association of Enabling Educators of Australia.

Tamra Ulpen, University of South Australia

M.A. in Applied Linguistics from Griffith University. Senior Lecturer at University of South Australia College. Co-facilitator of the Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students Special Interest Group, National Association of Enabling Educators of Australia.

Referências

ALBERT, Kendra; DELANO, Maggie. Algorithmic exclusion. In: LINDGREN, Simon (org.). Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023. p. 538–548.

BARRETT, Alex; PACK, Austin. Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 20, n. 1, p. 1–24, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0.

BEARMAN, Margaret; TAI, Joanna; DAWSON, Phillip; BOUD, David; AJJAWI, Rola. Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, p. 1–13, 2024. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2024.2335321.

BEER, David. The tensions of algorithmic thinking. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2023.

BENDER, Emily M.; GEBRU, Timnit; MCMILLAN-MAJOR, Angelina; SHMITCHELL, Shmargaret. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? ON THE DANGERS OF STOCHASTIC PARROTS, 2021, Virtual Event Canada. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Virtual Event Canada: ACM, 2021. p. 610–623. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3442188.3445922. Acesso em: 9 jul. 2023.

BENNETT, Anna; MOTTA, Sara; HAMILTON, Emma; RELF, Bronwyn; GRAY, Kim; LEROY-DYER, Sharlene. Enabling pedagogies: a participatory conceptual mapping of practices at the University of Newcastle, Australia. Newcastle: Newcastle University Centre of Excellence for Equity in Higher Education, 2018. Disponível em: https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:32947. Acesso em: 16 set. 2024.

BHAMBRA, Gurminder K.; GEBRIAL, Dalia; NIŞANCIOĞLU, Kerem (org.). Decolonising the university. Pluto Press, 2018. Disponível em: https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/39678. Acesso em: 15 set. 2024.

BIRHANE, Abeba; TALAT, Zeerak. It’s incomprehensible: on machine learning and decoloniality. In: LINDGREN, Simon (org.). Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023. p. 128–140.

BONINI, Tiziano; TRERÉ, Emiliano. Algorithms of resistance. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2024.

CAPRARO, Valerio; LENTSCH, Austin; ACEMOGLU, Daron; AKGUN, Selin; AKHMEDOVA, Aisel; BILANCINI, Ennio; BONNEFON, Jean-François; BRAÑAS-GARZA, Pablo; BUTERA, Luigi; DOUGLAS, Karen M.; EVERETT, Jim A. C.; GIGERENZER, Gerd; GREENHOW, Christine; HASHIMOTO, Daniel A.; HOLT-LUNSTAD, Julianne; JETTEN, Jolanda; JOHNSON, Simon; KUNZ, Werner H.; LONGONI, Chiara; LUNN, Pete; NATALE, Simone; PALUCH, Stefanie; RAHWAN, Iyad; SELWYN, Neil; SINGH, Vivek; SURI, Siddharth; SUTCLIFFE, Jennifer; TOMLINSON, Joe; VAN DER LINDEN, Sander; VAN LANGE, Paul A. M.; WALL, Friederike; VAN BAVEL, Jay J.; VIALE, Riccardo. The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making. PNAS Nexus, v. 3, n. 6, p. pgae191, 2024.

CASAL-OTERO, Lorena; CATALA, Alejandro; FERNÁNDEZ-MORANTE, Carmen; TABOADA, Maria; CEBREIRO, Beatriz, BARRO, Senén. AI literacy in K-12: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1–17, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7.

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. Australian framework for generative artificial intelligence in schools. Department of Education, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.education.gov.au/schooling/resources/australian-framework-generative-artificial-intelligence-ai-schools. Acesso em: 16 set. 2024.

CRAWFORD, Kate. The atlas of AI. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021.

DAEPP, Madeleine I. G.; COUNTS, Scott. The emerging AI divide in the United States. arXiv, 2024. Disponível em: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11988. Acesso em: 11 set. 2024.

DAWSON, Phillip. Remote proctoring: understanding the debate. In: EATON, Sarah Elaine (org.). Second handbook of academic integrity. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. p. 1511–1526.

DAWSON, Phillip; BEARMAN, Margaret; DOLLINGER, Mollie; BOUD, David. Validity matters more than cheating. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, p. 1–12, 2024. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2024.2386662.

DELANDA, Manuel. Assemblage theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.

DELEUZE, Gilles; GUATTARI, Félix. A thousand plateaus. Tradução de Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. 6. Courses of study. Department of Education, Australian Government, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-publications/higher-education-administrative-information-providers-october-2021/6-courses-study. Acesso em: 13 set. 2024.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. 2022 Section 2 all students. Department of Education, Australian Government, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.education.gov.au/higher-education-statistics/resources/2022-section-2-all-students. Acesso em: 14 set. 2024.

EUBANKS, Virginia. Automating inequality. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018.

FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogy of hope: reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Continuum, 1994.

FULLER, Michele; BARNES, Neil. The impact of ChatGPT on teaching and learning in higher education: exploring the dual perspectives of participants who were students and teachers. New Directions for Higher Education, v. 2024, n. 207, p. 31–46, 2024. DOI: 10.1002/he.20507.

GILLESPIE, Tarleton. Generative AI and the politics of visibility. Big Data & Society, v. 11, n. 2, p. 20539517241252131, 2024. DOI: 10.1177/20539517241252131.

GODWIN-JONES, Robert. Emerging spaces for language learning: AI bots, ambient intelligence, and the metaverse. Language Learning & Technology, v. 27, n. 2, p. 6–27, 2023.

HATTAM, Sarah; HATTAM, Robert; WEILER, Tanya; KING, Sharron. (org.). Enabling pedagogy and action research in higher education. Taiwan: DIO Press, 2024.

KASNECI, Enkelejda; SESSLER, Kathrin; KÜCHEMANN, Stefan; BANNERT, Maria; DEMENTIEVA, Daryna; FISCHER, Frank; GASSER, Urs; GROH, Georg; GÜNNEMANN, Stephan; HÜLLERMEIER, Eyke; KRUSCHE, Stephan; KUTYNIOK, Gitta; MICHAELI, Tilman; NERDEL, Claudia; PFEFFER, Jürgen; POQUET, Oleksandra; SAILER, Michael; SCHMIDT, Albrecht; SEIDEL, Tina; STADLER, Matthias; WELLER, Jochen; KUHN, Jochen; KASNECI, Gjergji. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, v. 103, p. 102274, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

KATZ, Yarden. Artificial whiteness. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020.

KHOSRAVI, Hassan; SHUM, Simon Buckingham; CHEN, Guanliang; CONATI, Cristina; TSAI, Yi-Shan; KAY, Judy; KNIGHT, Simon; MARTINEZ-MALDONADO, Roberto; SADIQ, Shazia; GAŠEVIĆ, Dragan. Explainable artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 3, p. 100074, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074.

KUTTY, Sangeetha; CHUGH, Ritesh; PERERA, Pethigamage; NEUPANE, Arjun; JHA, Meena; LI, Lily; GUNATHILAKE, Wijendra; PERERA, Nimeshia Chamini. Generative AI in higher education: perspectives of students, educators and administrators. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, v. 7, n. 2, 2024. DOI: 10.37074/jalt.2024.7.2.27. Disponível em: https://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt/article/view/2039. Acesso em: 2 set. 2024.

LAYWINE, Nathaniel; SIMON, Victoria; SINNREICH, Aram. Laughing to keep from [user input undefined]: ChatGPT, Jewish humor, and cultural erasure. First Monday, 2024. Disponível em: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/13375. Acesso em: 23 ago. 2024.

LINDGREN, Simon. Critical theory of AI. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2023.

LODGE, Jason M. The evolving risk to academic integrity posed by generative artificial intelligence: options for immediate action. TEQSA, 2024. Disponível em: https://www.teqsa.gov.au/about-us/news-and-events/latest-news/addressing-risk-genai-award-integrity. Acesso em: 30 set. 2024.

LODGE, Jason M.; HOWARD, Sarah; BEARMAN, Margaret; DAWSON, Phillip; AGOSTINHO, Shirley; SHUM, Simon Buckingham; DENEEN, Chris; ELLIS, Cath; FAWNS, Tim; GNIEL, Helen; HARPER, Rowena; HENDERSON, Michael; LIU, Danny; MARKAUSKAITE, Lina; MCLEAN, Jan; PERROTTA, Carlo; SCHUWIRTH, Lambert; SLADE, Christine. Assessment reform for the age of artificial intelligence. TEQSA, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.teqsa.gov.au/guides-resources/resources/corporate-publications/assessment-reform-age-artificial-intelligence. Acesso em: 23 ago. 2024.

LONG, Duri; MAGERKO, Brian. What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. CHI ’20. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020. p. 1–16. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3313831.3376727. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2023.

MCQUILLAN, Dan. Resisting AI. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2022.

NG, Davy Tsz Kit; LEUNG, Jac Ka Lok; CHU, Samuel Kai Wah; QIAO, Maggie Shen. Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 2, p. 100041, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041.

NOBLE, Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press, 2018.

O’BRIEN, Lewis; WATSON, Irene. In conversation with Uncle Lewis: bushfires, weather-makers, collective management. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, v. 10, n. 5, p. 450–461, 2014. DOI: 10.1177/117718011401000502.

OPENAI. Teaching with AI. Openai, 2024. Disponível em: https://openai.com/index/teaching-with-ai/. Acesso em: 13 set. 2024.

PERRIGO, Billy. Exclusive: The $2 per hour workers who made ChatGPT safer. Time, 18 jan. 2023. Disponível em: https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/. Acesso em: 2 ago. 2023.

PITMAN, Tim; TRINIDAD, Sue; DEVLIN, Marcia; HARVEY, Andrew; MATTHEW, Brett; MCKAY, Jade. Pathways to higher education. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education, Curtin University, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A73766. Acesso em: 1 jul. 2024.

POPENICI, Stefan. Artificial intelligence and learning futures. New York: Routledge, 2023.

PRATHER, James; REEVES, Brent N.; LEINONEN, Juho; MACNEIL, Stephen; RANDRIANASOLO, Arisoa S.; BECKER, Brett A.; KIMMEL, Bailey; WRIGHT, Jared; BRIGGS, Ben. The widening gap: the benefits and harms of generative AI for novice programmers. ICER ’24, 2024, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024. p. 469–486. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632620.3671116. Acesso em: 12 set. 2024.

SAEED, Waddah; OMLIN, Christian. Explainable AI (XAI): a systematic meta-survey of current challenges and future opportunities. Knowledge-Based Systems, v. 263, p. 110273, 2023.

SAMBELL, Kay; MCDOWELL, Liz; BROWN, Sally. “But is it fair?”: an exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, v. 23, n. 4, p. 349–371, 1997. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-491X(97)86215-3.

SHOR, Ira; FREIRE, Paulo. What is the “dialogical method” of teaching? Journal of Education, v. 169, n. 3, p. 11–31, 1987. DOI: 10.1177/002205748716900303.

STEPHENSON, Bret; HARVEY, Andrew. Student equity in the age of AI-enabled assessment: towards a politics of inclusion. In: AJJAWI, Rola; TAI, Joanna; BOUD, David; JORRE DE ST JORRE, Trina (org.). Assessment for inclusion in higher education: Promoting equity and social justice in assessment. New York: Routledge, 2023.

STOKES, Jennifer. “Those skills to take on the world”: developing capitals through university enabling programs. The International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, v. 28, n. 2, p. 133–146, 2021. DOI: 10.18848/2327-7955/CGP/v28i02/133-146.

STOKES, Jennifer; ULPEN, Tamra. Agents for change: applying critical pedagogy in enabling programs. The International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, v. 22, p. 57–65, 2015. DOI: 10.18848/2327-7955/CGP/v22i03/48624.

STONE, Cathy. From the margins to the mainstream: the online learning rethink and its implications for enhancing student equity. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, v. 38, n. 6, p. 139–149, 2022. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.8136.

SYME, Suzi; ROCHE, Thomas; GOODE, Elizabeth; CRANDON, Erin. Transforming lives: the power of an Australian enabling education. Higher Education Research & Development, v. 41, n. 7, p. 2426–2440, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2021.1990222.

UNESCO. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO, 2023. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693?locale=en. Acesso em: 16 set. 2024.

VAN DIJK, Jan. The network society. 4th. ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2020.

VELANDER, Johanna; OTERO, Nuno; MILRAD, Marcelo. What is critical (about) AI literacy? Exploring conceptualizations present in AI literacy discourse. In: BUCH, Anders; LINDBERG, Ylva; CERRATTO PARGMAN, Teresa (org.). Framing Futures in Postdigital Education. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. p. 139–160.

WARSCHAUER, Mark; TSENG, Waverly; YIM, Soobin; WEBSTER, Thomas; JACOB, Sharin; DU, Qian; TATE, Tamara. The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, v. 62, p. 101071, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071.

WIHBEY, John. AI and epistemic risk for democracy. SSRN. 2024. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4805026. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2024.