The relationship between subject position, focus and agreement in passive constructions in Brazilian Portuguese

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/el.v8i2.1132

Palabras clave:

Concordância, Foco, Construções Passivas, DPs pós-verbais

Resumen

This paper discusses the agreement patterns of passive structures in Brazilian Portuguese (BP). More specifically, we claim that the fact that postverbal DPs in such structures don’t necessarily trigger agreement on the verb and the participial head, whereas moved DPs always do, represents a problem for the Agree model proposed by Chomsky (1998 and subsequent work). We adopt Hornstein’s (2009) model, which eliminates Agree from the grammar, and propose that these postverbal DPs are actually focused in BP. The defective agreement patterns are suggested to be a consequence of the focused status of the DPs.
KEYWORDS: Agreement. Focus. Passive Constructions. Postverbal DPs.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Leonor Simioni, University of São Paulo (USP/Brazil)

Leonor Simioni is is currently a PhD student in Linguistics at Universidade de São Paulo. Her main research interests are clausal and DP-internal agreement phenomena and the syntax and semantics of DPs. She is a member of the project "Sintaxe Gerativa do Português Brasileiro na Entrada do Século XXI: Minimalismo e Interfaces", coordinated by Jairo Nunes and funded by FAPESP.

Citas

BAILYN, J. A configurational approach to Russian “free” word order. Doctoral dissertation - Cornell University, 1995.
BELLETTI, A. The Case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, Cambridge, v. 19, p. 1-14, 1988.
BELLETTI, A. “Inversion” as focalization and related questions. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, Barcelona, v. 7, p. 9-45, 1999.
Bošković, Z. On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: an even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry, Cambridge, v. 38, p. 589-644, 2007.
CARDINALETTI, A. A second thought on emarginazione: destressing vs. ‘Right Dislocation’. In: CINQUE, G.; SALVI, G. P. (Ed.). Current Studies in Italian Syntax: essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi.
Amsterdam: North Holland, 2001. p 117-135.
CHOMSKY, N. The minimalist program. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1995. 420 p.
CHOMSKY, N. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In: MARTIN, R.; MICHAELS, D.; URIAGEREKA, J. (Ed.). Step by Step. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000. p. 89-155.
HORNSTEIN, N. A theory of syntax: minimal operations and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 204 p.
MIOTO, C. Focalização e quantificação. Revista Letras, Curitiba, n. 61, p. 169-189, 2003.
NARO, A. J.; SCHERRE, M. M. P. Origens do Português Brasileiro. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2007. 208 p.
NUNES, J. Relativized minimality and the Extended Peeking Principle. Cadernos de Linguística, v. XIV, p. 73-86, 2007.
REINHART, T. Interface strategies: optimal and costly computations. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2006. 340 p.
SIBALDO, M. A. Nominais pós-verbais em estruturas inacusativas: o efeito de definitude no Português Brasileiro. Manuscrito não-publicado.
STJEPANOVIC, S. A Word-order paradox resolved by copy deletion at PF. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, v. 3, p. 139-177, 2003.
ZUBIZARRETA, M. L. Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1998. 213 p.

Descargas

Publicado

2010-12-30

Cómo citar

SIMIONI, L. The relationship between subject position, focus and agreement in passive constructions in Brazilian Portuguese. Estudios del lenguaje, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 173-187, 2010. DOI: 10.22481/el.v8i2.1132. Disponível em: https://periodicos2.uesb.br/index.php/estudosdalinguagem/article/view/1132. Acesso em: 24 ago. 2024.