Digital technologies for equitable quality education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/praxisedu.v21i52.17108

Keywords:

edtech, teacher education, free and open digital technologies, public edtech, equity

Abstract

The use of digital technologies in education (‘EdTech’) has created problems of centralization of control over educational processes as well as privatization of education. The use of proprietary EdTech creates a dangerous vendor lock-in, in which teacher agency and institutional autonomy are compromised. This endangers the social transformation goals of education. The use of ‘Artificial Intelligence’ now, threatens to aggravate the danger, as it accentuates the existing social biases and increases corporate control over education. In order to enable equitable quality of education for all children, digital technologies must firstly, be designed to enable inclusive and participatory teaching-learning processes, effective teacher education for developing ‘professional and humane’ teachers, and decentralized education administration. For achieving this, it is essential that we use only free and open digital technologies, that are licensed to allow all (including teachers), to freely share and customize for their own use. Secondly the primary use of EdTech should be to empower teachers to develop a critical understanding of tech, and design its appropriation in school education. Education systems should keep technology vendors out of EdTech policy and privilege the role of informed educators in EdTech policy, design, and implementation in the education system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gurumurthy Kasinathan, IT for Change

Director of IT for Change (NGO based in Bengaluru, India), Convener of Research Interest Group on Education and Technology at Comparative Education Society of India (CESI). Member of Karnataka State Education Policy Commission, Task Force on Curriculum.

Authorship contribution: author

Susan Sreemala, IT for Change

supports communications, internal knowledge management and editorial work at IT for Change. She holds a Master’s degree in Law, Politics, and Society from Ambedkar University, Delhi and a Bachelor’s degree from St. Stephen's College, Delhi in Political Science and Economics.

Authorship contribution: editorial support

References

ACEMOGLU, Daron. AI's future doesn't have to be dystopian. Boston Review, 24 maio 2021. Disponível em: http://bostonreview.net/science-nature/daron-acemoglu-redesigning-ai. Acesso em: 22 out. 2024.

EUROPEAN UNION. Annex III: High Risk AI Systems. EU Artificial Intelligence Act. European Union, 2024. Disponível em: https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/annex/3/. Acesso em: 22 out. 2024.

FLYNN, Shannon. 13 Cities Where Police Are Banned From Using Facial Recognition Tech. Innovation & Tech Today, 2020. Disponível em: https://innotechtoday.com/13-cities-where-police-are-banned-from-using-facial-recognition-tech Acesso em: 22 out. 2024.

KASINATHAN, Guru. Policy Brief – ICTs in Education: Outsourced versus Integrated Approach. IT for Change, 2009. Disponível em: https://itforchange.net/index.php/policy-brief-%E2%80%93-icts-education-outsourced-versus-integrated-approach. Acesso em: 22 out. 2024.

KASINATHAN, Guru. Making AI work in Indian education. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2020. Disponível em: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/indien/15953.pdf. Acesso em: 22 out. 2024.

KASINATHAN, Guru. National Education Policy 2020 – Imagining Digital Technologies as a Resource to Achieve Educational Aims. Voices of Teachers and Teacher Educators, v. 10, n. 2, p. 20–28, 2021.

KUMAR, Krishna. Origins of India's "Textbook Culture". Comparative Education Review, v. 32, n. 4, p. 452-464, 1988. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1188251. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2021.

VAN DIJCK, José van.; POELL, Thomas. Higher Education in a Networked World: European Responses to U.S. MOOCs. International Journal of Communication, 2015. Disponível em: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c9d0/a7933dad4c445740997a232721eb34bf9633.pdf. Acesso em: 22 out. 2024.

NCERT. NCERT National ICT Curriculum. National Council of Educational Research and Training, 2013. Disponível em: https://ictcurriculum.gov.in. Acesso em: 22 out. 2024.

TOYOMA, Kentaro. There Are No Technology Shortcuts to Good Education. Educational Technology Debate, 2011. Disponível em: http://edutechdebate.org/ict-in-schools/there-are-no-technology-shortcuts-to-good-education. Acesso em: 22 out. 2024.

WEST, Mark. An ed-tech tragedy? Educational technologies and school closures in the time of COVID-19. UNESCO, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-09

How to Cite

KASINATHAN, Gurumurthy; SREEMALA, Susan. Digital technologies for equitable quality education. Práxis Educacional, Vitória da Conquista, v. 21, n. 52, p. e17108, 2025. DOI: 10.22481/praxisedu.v21i52.17108. Disponível em: https://periodicos2.uesb.br/praxis/article/view/17108. Acesso em: 19 may. 2026.

Issue

Section

Seção Temática