A NOÇÃO DE CAPACIDADE ARGUMENTATIVA EM DIFERENTES PERSPECTIVAS DE ESTUDO DA ARGUMENTAÇÃO

Sheyla Fabrícia Alves  Lima; Eduardo Lopes  Piris

doi:10.22481/folio.v13i2.9324

Authors

Sheyla Fabrícia Alves Lima Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Uesc) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2159-1797
Eduardo Lopes Piris Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Uesc) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3718-8126

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/folio.v13i2.9324

Keywords:

Capacity Development. Teaching argumentation. Different Trends.

Abstract

This article aims to discuss the concept of capacity, reflecting on the contributions of the different aspects found in the literature so that we can delimit how these works present the concept of argumentation and its application in teaching. This reflection proves to be opportune because it allows us to question the foundations that should support the development of students' abilities at school and contribute, in future research, to the organization of content and teaching-learning methodologies for argumentation. The bibliographic methodology allowed mapping, collating and discussing concepts that encompass the notions of ability, capacity and competence exclusively directed to the act of arguing, such as distinctly found in Kuhn (1991), Golder (1992), Dolz (1994; 1996), Camps and Dolz (1995), Felton and Kuhn (2001), Hample (2003), Kuhn and Udell (2003), Dolz and Schneuwly (2004) and Azevedo (2013; 2016; 2019). The results allowed us to observe that the main gaps found regarding the teaching of argumentation from the perspective of capabilities can be minimized by understanding its dispersion in different perspectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sheyla Fabrícia Alves Lima, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Uesc)

Doutoranda em Letras pela Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Uesc).

Eduardo Lopes Piris, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Uesc)

Doutorado em Filologia e Língua Portuguesa pela Universidade de São Paulo (Usp). Professor Titular nível A da Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (Uesc).

References

Azevedo ICM. Confluencias y distinciones entre las nociones de capacidad y competencia argumentativas. In: Vitale MA, et al (Orgs.). Estudios sobre discurso y argumentación. Coimbra: Grácio Editor; 2019. p. 167-193.

Azevedo ICM. Capacidades argumentativas de professores e estudantes da educação básica em discussão. In: Piris EL, Ferreira MO (Orgs.). Discurso e argumentação em múltiplos enfoques. Coimbra: Grácio Editor; 2016. p. 167-190.

Azevedo ICM. Desenvolvimento de competências e capacidades de linguagem por meio da escrita de textos de opinião. EID&A. 2013; (4): 35-47.

Camps A, Dolz J. Introducción: enseñar a argumentar: un desafío para la escuela actual. Comun Lenguaj Educ. 1995; (25): 5-8.

Dolz J. La interacción de las actividades orales y escritas en la enseñanza de la argumentación. Comun Lenguaj Educ. 1994; 6(3): 17-27.

Dolz J. Learning argumentative capacities: a study of the effects of a systematic and intensive teaching. Argumentation. 1996; (10): 227-251.

Dolz J. ¿Cómo enseñar a escribir relatos históricos?. Aula Innov Educ. 1992; (2): 23-28.

Dolz J, Pasquier A, Bronckart JP. L’acquisition des discours: émergence d’une compétence ou apprentissage de capacidades langagières?. Etud Linguist Appl. 1993; (102): 23-37.

Dolz J, Rosat MC, Schneuwly B. Elaboration et évaluation de deux séquences didactiques relatives à trois types de textes. Fr aujourd'hui. 1991; (92): 37-47.

Dolz J, Schneuwly B. Gêneros em expressão oral e escrita. In: Dolz J, Schneuwly B. Gêneros orais e escritos na escola. Tradução de Roxane Rojo e Glais Sales Cordeiro. Campinas: Mercado de Letras; 2004. p. 41-70.

Rosat MC. À propos de la réalisation orale et écrite d’un texte argumentatif. Etud Linguist Appl. 1991; (87): 37-50.

Schneuwly B. Didactique de l'écrit en Français Langue Maternelle: une approche expérimentale. In: Acquisition et Enseignement/Apprentissage des Langues. Grenoble: LIDILEM; 1992. p. 511-518.

Bereiter C, Scardamalia M. From conversation to composition: the role of instruction in a developmental process. In: Glaser R (Ed.). Advances in Instructional Psychology. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1982. v. 2. p. 1-64.

Felton M, Kuhn D. The development of argumentative discourse skills. Discourse Process. 2001; p. 135-153.

François F. Dialogue, discussion et argumentation au début de la scolarité. Pratiques. 1980; (28): 83-94.

Golder C. Justification et négociation en situação monogérée et polygérée dans les discours argumentatifs. Enfance. 1992; 46(1-2): 99-112.

Hample D. Arguing skill. In: Greene JO, Burleson BR (Eds.). Handbook of communication and social interaction skills. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003. p. 439-478.

Kuhn D. The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1991.

Kuhn D, Udell W. The development of argument skills. Child Dev. 2003; (74): 1245-1260.

III. Perspectivas Teóricas e a Nova Retórica

Leontiev AN. The problem of activity in psychology. In: Wertsch JV (Ed.). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. New York: ME Sharpe; 1981. p. 37-61.

O’Keefe DJ. Two concepts of argument. J Am Forensic Assoc. 1977; (13): 121-128.

Perelman C, Olbrechts-Tyteca L. Tratado da argumentação: a nova retórica. São Paulo: Martins Fontes; 1996 [1958].

Plantin C. A argumentação: história, teorias, perspectivas. Tradução de Marcos Marcionilo. São Paulo: Parábola; 2008 [2005].

Walton DN. Dialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation. 1989; (3): 169-184.

Wenzel JW. Perspectives on argument: twenty years later. Alta: National Communication Association; 1999.

Wenzel JW. Three perspectives on argument: Rhetoric, dialectic and logic. In: Trapp R, Schuetz J (Eds.). Perspectives on argumentation: essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede. Prospect Heights: Waveland; 1990. p. 9-26.