In between cognition and discourse: gender stereotypes, woman and politics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/el.v18i3.7952

Keywords:

Pre-discourses; Cognitive-discursive memory; Metaphor; Gender stereotypes; Politics.

Abstract

This paper intends to analyse an expression that has stood out in the Brazilian political scene especially: “SHE IS (A) [male Pn] IN SKIRT(S)”, as in “she is a Bolsonaro in skirts”, referring to the Brazilian congresswoman Joice Hasselmann. The analysis are based on the articulation between discourse and cognition as proposed by the category of pre-discourses (PAVEAU, 2013a), conceived as shared frames of beliefs, knowledge and practices that inform discourses both in producing and interpreting meanings. Articulated with considerations on gender stereotypes as primary frames (RIDGEWAY, 2009), the analysis point to the construction of feminin representation in the Brazilian politics strongly connected to the male universe, reinforcing, thus, the duality between public and private spaces, which relegate women to the latter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ana Carolina Vilela-Ardenghi, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT/Brazil)

Ana Carolina Vilela-Ardenghi holds a PhD in Linguistics from the State University of Campinas (2014) and a Master's in Linguistics from the Federal University of Uberlândia (2007). She is a professor in the Literature course and a permanent staff member of the Postgraduate Program in Language Studies at the Federal University of Mato Grosso. She develops research in Discourse Analysis, being especially interested in themes related to the circulation of representations of the feminine in discourses.

References

AMOSSY, Ruth; PIERROT, Anne Herschberg. Estereotipos y clichés. Buenos Aires: Editorial Universitária de Buenos Aires, 2005.

BIROLI, Flávia. O público e o privado. In: BIROLI, Flávia; MIGUEL, Luis Felipe. Feminismo e política. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2014, p. 31-46.

BIROLI, Flávia; MIGUEL, Luis Felipe. Feminismo e política. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2014.

EAGLY, Alice H.; KARAU, Stephen J. Role congruity theory of prejudice towards female leaders. Psychological Review, n. 109, p. 573-579, 2002.

FISKE, Susan T. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In: GILBERT, D. T.; FISKE, S. T.; LINDZEY, G. The hand book of social psychology. v. 2. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1998.

LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Metáforas da Vida Cotidiana. Campinas: Mercado de Letras / EDUC, 2002. Edição original: 1980.

LIPPMANN, Walter. Opinião pública. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2008. Edição original: 1922.

MAINGUENEAU, Dominique. Frases sem Texto. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2014.

MOIRAND, Sophie. L’apport de petits corpus à la compréhension des faits d’actualité. Corpus, n.18, 2018. Disponível em: http://journals.openedition.org/corpus/3519 . Acesso em 19 Abr. 2019.

PAVEAU, Marie-Anne. Os pré-discursos: sentido, memória, cognição. Campinas: Pontes Editores, 2013a.

PAVEAU, Marie-Anne. Memória, des-memória, a-memória: quando o discurso volta-se para seu passado. Tradução: Jocilene Santana Prado e Eduardo Lopes Piris. EID&A - Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação, Ilhéus, n. 5, p. 137-161, dez. 2013b. Disponível em: https://periodicos.uesc.br/index.php/eidea/issue/view/49 . Acesso em 20 Ago. 2020.

POSSENTI, Sírio. O dado dado e o dado dado. In: ______. Os limites do discurso. Curitiba: Criar Edições, 2002, p. 27-36.

POSSENTI, Sírio. A misoginia como condicionante do golpe de 2016 no Brasil. Discurso & Sociedad, Vol.12(3), 2018, p. 581-593.

RIDGEWAY, Cecilia. Framed before we know it: how gender shapes social relations. Gender & Society, v. 23, n. 2, abr. 2009, p. 145-160.

SILVA, Perla Haydee da. De louca a incompetente: construções discursivas em relação à ex-presidenta Dilma Rousseff. 2019. Tese (Doutorado em Estudos de Linguagem). Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, 2019.

Published

2020-11-30

How to Cite

VILELA-ARDENGHI, A. C. In between cognition and discourse: gender stereotypes, woman and politics. Language Studies, [S. l.], v. 18, n. 3, p. 173-188, 2020. DOI: 10.22481/el.v18i3.7952. Disponível em: https://periodicos2.uesb.br/index.php/estudosdalinguagem/article/view/7952. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.