INTERVIEW ON QUEER PEDAGOGY AND INCLUSIVE EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22481/odeere.v3i6.4605Abstract
The epistemological understanding of Inclusive Education expresses a diasporic functioning, that is, the forms of construction of its knowledge, operate through a dispersion of knowledge, distributed by a multiplicity of epistemic geographies, among them, Feminism, Queer Theory, Postcolonial Studies, among others. In this case, the contributions of Feminism and Queer Studies become key instances of knowledge to promote the proposition of a new rationality - increasingly broad in its proposals and systems of reasoning - to justify the relevance of inclusion beyond production of fictions based on inclusion in it - within the Science of Education in the 21st century. Returning to the idea of Inclusive Education as "category of analysis" and "macroeducational device" (Ocampo, 2017), this interview analyzes the political, epistemic and pedagogical intersections Queer Pedagogy shares with Inclusive Education; recognizing the former as one of its main epistemic memories of transformation. On this occasion, Dr. Nilson Dinis, an academic of the Department of Education and Non-Program of Graduation in Education of the Federal University of São Carlos, gives us interesting reflections on the configuration of a field that, although it expresses a long history in subaltern epistemologies, is known and understood from a position of remoteness and periphery in the education and training of teachers. Dr. Dinis also deepens the understanding of trans, its agency and political repercussions on educational grammars. At the same time, it gives key ideas to address the curriculum, the operational logics of educational institutions and the co-management of sexual identities in the educational context. Undoubtedly, their contributions contribute to positioning a topic that public and educational policies in the field of Inclusive Education production is subordinated, generating new apartheid strategies of knowledge or in terms of Spivak (1998) or Foucault (1970), epistemic violence , become the so-called "voids of diversity," which are only declarations that attract the notion of difference to the center of capitalism, without addressing it, leaving it in a permanent situation of social and defenseless devaluation. In short, the interview mirrors an increasing complexity, inviting us to overcome the pedagogical simplicities in this respect.
Keywords: Queer pedagogy, inclusive education, multiplicity of differences, action and political resistance.Downloads
References
Britzman, Deborah. (1995). Is there a queer pedagogy? Or stop reading straight. Educational Theory, 45 (2), 151-166.
Britzman, Deborah (1998). Lost subjects, contested objects: towards a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning. New York: State University of New York Press.
Bryson, Mary; Castell, Suzanne de. (1993). Queer Pedagogy: Praxis makes im/perfect. Canadian Journal of Education, 18 (3), 285-305.
Butler, Judith. (2004). Undoing Gender. New York and London: Routledge.
Dinis, Nilson (2013). Por uma pedagogia queer. Itinerarius Reflectionis, 2 (2), 1-12. Foucault, Michel. (1979). Microfísica do poder. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Graal.
Guattari, Félix. (1981). Revolução molecular: pulsações políticas do desejo. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
Louro, Guacira Lopes. (2004). Um corpo estranho: ensaios sobre sexualidade e teoria queer. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.
Preciado, Paul Beatriz. (2002). Manifiesto contra-sexual. Madrid: Editorial Opera Prima.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 ODEERE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; Adapt - remix, transform, and build from the material for any purpose, even commercially. This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Attribution - You must appropriately give credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests that you or your use is endorsed by the licensor.
There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others to make any use permitted by the license.