El estudio de las imágenes de la educación inclusiva
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22481/odeere.v9i2.14864Keywords:
Aesthetics, Distribution of sensible, Inclusive education, Performative images, Visibility regimeAbstract
This work analyzes some key tensions in the study of images of inclusive education. Its aesthetic dimension finds a high analytical fertility through the phrase ‘aesthetics of dissent’. This label plays a central role in Rancière's thinking, whose meanings about aesthetics are played in devices for reorganizing sensible experience, exploring the naturalness of gestures, glances and whispers of words and image records with those we come into contact with to interact with a certain phenomenon. The power of the imagination of inclusive education is highly configurative, therefore, it supports the diversification of topics that inform part of his sensitive thinking. Another of the potentialities of his imagination underlies his ability to create different classes of images. What's more, inclusive education is an image made up of many other images. It is through imagination that, in this way, specifically relates to the world and educational processes. The work presents a critical documentary review methodology. Among its main conclusions, it highlights the need to take on the aesthetic study of inclusive education, to launch a process of reconsideration and/or translation of the ‘political’ attribute into the deepest depths of our imaginative and perceptual apparatus. Furthermore, inclusive education constructs an intellectual code that tends to destabilize its order of dominance and the apparatus of fiction that has subdued the authentic understanding of its signs. It's about learning to reveal the specific thinking regime that it constructs, the object of being able to enter it, to separate other ways of seeing and ways of thinking about something
Downloads
References
BAL, Mieke. Lexicón para el análisis cultural. Madrid: Akal, 2021.
BACHELARD, Gastón. El agua y los sueños. Ensayos sobre la imaginación de la
materia. Ciudad de México: FCE, 2012.
CERECEDA, Miguel. “Sobre el reparto de lo sensible”. In: VEGA, Francisco; ROCCO,
Valerio. (Eds.). Estética del disenso. Políticas del arte en Jacques Rancière. Santiago:
Doble Ciencia, 2018, p. 47-58.
DIDI-HUBERMAN, George. Desear desobedecer. Lo que nos levanta, 1. Madrid:
Abada Editores, 2020.
OCAMPO, Aldo. La educación inclusiva y el problema del gobierno de sus signos.
Revista
de
Investigaciones,
https://doi.org/10.22383/ri.v21i37.157.
v.
,
n.
,
p.
-26,
OCAMPO, Aldo. Configuración de los dispositivos semióticos de la educación
inclusiva. Revista Domínios da Imagem, v. 16, n. 29, p. 220-247, 2022.
Página21
RANCIÈRE, Jacques; VEGA, Francisco. “Estética del disenso. Entrevista con Jacques
Rancière”. In: VEGA, Francisco; ROCCO, Valerio. (Eds.). Estética del disenso.
Políticas del arte en Jacques Rancière. Santiago: Doble Ciencia, 2018, p. 191-203.
RANCIÈRE, Jacques. Disenso. Ensayos sobre estética y política. Buenos Aires: FCE,
SOTO, Andrea. “Potencias e impotencias de las imágenes en el pensamiento de
Jacques Rancière”. In: VEGA, Francisco; ROCCO, Valerio (Eds.). Estética del disenso.
Políticas del arte en Jacques Rancière. Santiago: Doble Ciencia, 2018, p. 135-149.
SOTO, Andrea. La performatividad de las imágenes. Santiago: Metales Pesados,
SOTO, Andrea. Imaginación material. Santiago: Metales Pesados, 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ODEERE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; Adapt - remix, transform, and build from the material for any purpose, even commercially. This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.
Under the following terms:
Attribution - You must appropriately give credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in a way that suggests that you or your use is endorsed by the licensor.
There are no additional restrictions - You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others to make any use permitted by the license.