The relevance of phonetics teaching for english sounds perception

Autores

  • Eliane da Rosa ULBRA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/lnostra.v4i2.13244

Palavras-chave:

Phonetics Teaching, Auditory Perception, English Front, High Vowels

Resumo

As many researches have shown the contributions of phonetics instruction in L2/FL learners’ speech perception and production, this study seeks to investigate the role of phonetics teaching to the perception of the English front high vowels /i/ and /?/ by Brazilian learners from an international language school. Identification pre/posttests were designed through the TP software (RAUBER; RATO; KLUGE; SANTOS, 2012) in order to measure the participants’ perception on the vowels mentioned above. Comparing the results obtained from tests, it is possible to assume that the learners, who received phonetics instruction on the English front high vowels /i/ and /?/, demonstrated a better performance in distinguishing and interpreting those sounds accurately than the learners, who did not receive any instruction. It means that phonetics teaching improves English learners’ sounds perception.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Eliane da Rosa, ULBRA

Eliane da Rosa, ULBRA

Special Student in the Post-graduation Program in Letters of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (field: Language Studies). Master in Morphology and Phonology (UFRGS), specialist in English Teaching and Learning (Uniritter) and graduated in English (ULBRA). Phonetics and English teacher at FISK Teaching Center.

Referências

ALLAN, D. Oxford placement test 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

ARAÚJO, L. M. M.; FENIMAN, M. R.; CARVALHO, F. R. P. de; LOPES-HERRERA, S. A. Ensino da língua inglesa: contribuições da fonética, fonologia e do processamento auditivo. Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica. 2010, p. 183-188.

AZEREDO SILVA, F. C. Contribuições da fonética e da fonologia ao ensino de língua estrangeira: o caso das vogais altas frontais e do glide /j/ no inglês e no português brasileiro. Master’s Dissertation. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2004.

BAPTISTA, B. O. The acquisition of English vowels by Brazilian-Portuguese speakers. Florianópolis: UFSC, 2000.

BARREIRA, S. R. C. O desenvolvimento da compreensão oral por meio de instrução explícita sobre a fonologia do inglês em estágios iniciais da aprendizagem. Master’s Dissertation. Fortaleza: UEC, 2008.

BAUMAN-WANGLER, J. A. Articulatory and phonological impairments: a clinical focus. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, 2012.

CELCE-MURCIA, M.; BRINTON, D. M.; GOODWIN, J. M.; GRINER, B. Teaching pronunciation: a coursebook and reference guide. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

COATS, P. J. The effect of explicit instruction on the perception of Spanish stops by speakers of Korean. Master's Dissertation. Columbia: University of South Carolina, 2014.

GHORBANI, M. R. The Impact of phonetic instruction on Iranian students’ listening ability enhancement. The Asian EFL Journal, vol. 52, 2011, p. 24-34.

GORDON, J.; DARCY, I.; EWERT, D. Pronunciation teaching and learning: effects of explicit phonetic instruction in the L2 classroom. In: LEVIS, J. ; LEVELLE, K. (eds.).

Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Iowa State University: 2013. p. 194-206.

GOSWAMI, J. S.; CHEN, H-Y. The impact of instruction in phonetic and phonemic distinctions in sounds on the pronunciation of Spanish-speaking ESL learners MEXTESOL Journal, vol. 34, nº 1, 2010, p. 29-39.

GROOT, A. M. B. de. Language and cognition in bilinguals and multilinguals: an introduction. New York: Psychology Press, 2011.

DERWING, T. M.; MUNRO, M. J. Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: a research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, vol. 39, nº 3, 2005, p. 379-397.

FARIA, A. Applied phonetics: portuguese text-to-speech. Berkeley: University of California, 2003. Retrieved from: <http://www1.icsi.berkeley.edu/~arlo/publications/faria_ling110_proj.pdf>. Date of

access: June 1st, 2016.

FLEGE, J. E. Interactions between the native and second-language phonetics systems. In: BURMEISTER, Petra; PISKE, Thorsten; ROHDE, Andreas (eds.). An integrated view of language development: papers in honor of Henning Wode. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 2002, p. 217-244.

______. A method for assessing the perception of vowels in a second language. In: FAVA, Elisabetta; MIONI, Alberto (eds.). Issues in clinical linguistics. Padova: UNIPRESS, 2003, p. 19-43.

______. Second Language Speech Learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In: STRANGE, W. (ed.). Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Timonium, MD: York Press, 1995, p. 233-277.

FRASER, H. ESL pronunciation teaching: could it be more effective?. Paper presented at the ALAA Conference, Perth, 1999. Retrieved from: <https://www.cdu.edu.au/walking_talking_texts/documents/Pronunciation-paperbyHelenFraser.doc.>. Date of access: Jun. 20 th 2016.

_______. H. Teachers help students with pronunciation: a cognitive approach. Prospect, vol. 21, nº 1, 2006.

KENNEDY, S.; BLANCHET, J.; TROFIMOVICH, P. L2 learners’ speech after French phonetics teaching. In: PRZEDLACKA, Joanna; MAIDMENT, John; ASHBY, Michael (eds.). Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference. London: UCL, 2013, p. 43-46.

KISSLING, E. M. The effect of phonetics instruction on adults’ learners perception and production of L2 sounds. Doctoral Dissertation. Washington DC: Georgetown University, 2012.

LABOV, W. Padrões sociolinguísticos. Translation: Marcos Bagno et al. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2008 [1972].

_________. Principles of linguistic change: internal factors. vol. 1. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994.

LADEFOGED, P.; JOHNSON, K. A course in phonetics. 6. ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2011.

LARSEN-FREEMAN, D; CAMERON, L. Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

LOGAN, J. S.; PRUITT, J. S. Methodological issues in training listeners to perceive non-native phonemes. In: STRANGE, W. (ed.). Speech perception and linguistic experience: theoretical and methodological issues. Timonium, MD: York Press, 1995, p. 351-378.

LINTUNEN, P. The effect of phonetic knowledge on evaluated pronunciation problems. In: PRZEDLACKA, Joanna; MAIDMENT, John; ASHBY, Michael (eds.). Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference. London: UCL, 2013, p. 55-58.

LIPINSKA, D. Influence of formal instruction in english phonetics and phonology on Polish learners’ production of english /æ/. In: PRZEDLACKA, Joanna; MAIDMENT, John; ASHBY, Michael (eds.). Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference. London: UCL, 2013, p. 59-62.

PISONI, D.; LIVELY, S. Variability and invariance in speech perception: a new look at some old problems in perceptual learning. In: STRANGE, W. (ed.). Speech perception and linguistic experience: theoretical and methodological issues. Timonium, MD: York Press, 1995, p. 443-459.

RAUBER, A. S., RATO, A., SANTOS, G. R, KLUGE, D. C., FIGUEIREDO, M. TP: perception tests and perceptual training with imediate feedback. [software]. Retrieved from: <http://www.worken.com.br/tp_regfree.php>. Date of access: October 10th, 2015.

ROACH, P. English phonetics and phonology: a practical course. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

SILVA, T. C. Pronúncia do inglês para falantes do português brasileiro. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012.

STEINBERG, M. Inglês norte-americano: pronúncia e morfologia. São Paulo: Nova Alexandria, 2006.

STURM, J. L. Explicit phonetics instruction in L2 French: a global analysis of improvement. System, vol. 41, 2013, p. 654-662.

TRUBETZKOY, N. S. Principles of phonology. Translation of Christiane A. M. Baltaxe. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1971 [1958].

ZIMMER, M.; SILVEIRA, R.; ALVES, U. K. Pronunciation instruction for Brazilians: bringing theory and practice together. New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009.

Downloads

Publicado

2017-01-21

Como Citar

da Rosa, E. . (2017). The relevance of phonetics teaching for english sounds perception. Língu@ Nostr@, 4(2), 3 - 22. https://doi.org/10.22481/lnostra.v4i2.13244