THE EFFECTS OF CONVERGENT AND DIVERGENT TASKS ON IRANIAN EFL SPEAKING PERFORMANCE

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/praxisedu.v16i37.6170

Palavras-chave:

Tarefa convergente, Tarefa divergente, Desempenho de fala, Alunos de EFL

Resumo

O presente estudo teve como objetivo investigar os efeitos de tarefas convergentes e divergentes no desempenho da fala dos alunos de EFL no Irã. A população inicial deste estudo foi de 100 alunos de EFL. Eles foram selecionados no Mahan language Institute localizado em Karaj, Irã. Todos os participantes eram do sexo feminino. A língua nativa deles era o persa. Após a administração do Teste Preliminar de Inglês (PET), 60 alunos que tiveram seu nível de proficiência intermediário com base nos escores do PET foram selecionados para o estudo. Em seguida, eles foram divididos aleatoriamente em dois grupos experimentais, a saber, grupo de tarefas convergente e grupo de tarefas divergente. Os resultados do estudo revelaram que ambas as abordagens têm diferentes níveis de impacto no desempenho da fala e tarefas convergentes e divergentes afetam diferentemente o desempenho da fala dos alunos intermediários iranianos de EFL. Os resultados demonstraram que a amostra que recebeu tratamento baseado em tarefas divergentes mostrou um desenvolvimento significativo em termos de desempenho na fala (do pré-teste M = 68 ao pós-teste M = 83).

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Metrics

Carregando Métricas ...

Biografia do Autor

Seyed Javad Roudehchi Tabrizi, Islamic Azad University – Iran

Department of English Language Education, Marand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marand, Iran.

Samar Goldouz, Islamic Azad University - Irã

Department of English Language Education, Marand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marand, Iran.

Bahram Hadad Badr, Azerbaijan University of Applied Science & Technology - Iran

Department of Power Plant Mechanics, Azerbaijan University of Applied Science & Technology, Tabriz, Iran.

Referências

Astika, G. (2004). A task-based approach to reading English for specialist purposes. EA Journal, 22(2), 22-35.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. San Francisco: Prentice Hall Regents.
Burkart, G. & Sheppard, K. (2004). Content ESL across the USA: A Training Packet. A Descriptive Study of Content-ESL Practices. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition.
Burns, A. & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on Speaking. Sydney: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.
Bygate, M. (1987). Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bygate, M. (1998). “Theoretical Perspectives on Speaking”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.18 (1), 20-42.
Bygate, M. (2002). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate et al.., (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23-48). Harlow: Longman.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). "Language Teaching Approaches: an Overview". In M. Celce- Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd Ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Cornbleet, S. and Carter, R. (2001). The Language of Speech and Writing. London: Routledge.
Cunningham, F. M. (1999). English language learners’ speaking skill. Eric Digest. Retrieved January, 15, 2009, from, ttp//:www.Eric.ed .gov
Duff, P. A. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition, (pp. 147-181). Rowley, MA: Newbery House.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Florez, M. A. (1999). "Improving Adult English Language Learners’ Speaking Skills". ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED: 435204
Graham-Marr, A. (2004). Teaching skills for listening and speaking. Retrieved, April, 9, 2009, from, http://www Abax . Co. jp/downloads/ extension/ETJ 2004.
Hilferty, A. (2005). "The Relationship between Reading and Speaking Skills". Focus on Basics. http://www.ncsall.net/?id=328, accessed on 22nd May, 2006.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experiential learning and development. Newjersy: Practice-Hall,Inc.
Latchem, C., Latchem, C. R., & Jung, I. (2010). Distance and blended learning in Asia. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Levlet, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: from Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Long, M. (1989). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Luoma, S. 2004. Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Makumar, R. (2010). The impact of different task variance on writing proficiency. Retrieved on October 6, 2011, from: www.scripties.let.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/root/Master/ DoorstroomMasters/ToegepasteTaalwetens/2010/Makmur.
Marashi, H., & Hatam, G. (2009). Using tasks in a content-based program: Does it enhance vocabulary learning? Iranian Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature, 1(4), 73-91.
Marashi, H., & Shizari, T. Parisa. (2015). Using Convergent and Divergent Tasks to Improve Writing and Language Learning Motivation. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3 (1), 99-117.
Nezhad. R., & Shokrpour, G. N. (2013). The Impact of Task Type and Divergent Thinking on Reading Proficiency. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies. 2 (2), 124-137.
Nielsen, H., Bayard, M., Pickett, C., & Simonton, D. (2008). Conceptual versus experimental creativity: Which works best on convergent and divergent thinking tasks? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 131-138.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Nunan, D. (2004). An Introduction to Task Based Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (2006). Task-based language teaching in the Asia context: Defining ‘task’. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 12-18.
Pica, T. (1997). Second language teaching and research relationships: A North American view. Language Teaching Research, 1, 48-72.
Plews, J. L., & Zhao, K. (2010). Tinkering with tasks knows no bounds: ESL teachers’ adaptations of task-based language-teaching. TESL Canada Journal, 28(1), 41-59.
Pourdana, N., Karimi Behbahani, M., & Safdari, M. (2011). The impact of task types on aspects of Iranian EFL learners' writing performance: Accuracy, fluency, and complexity. IPEDR, 20, 261-265.
Prabhu, N.S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University.
Regina, S. (1997). English Language Arts: A Curriculum Guide for the Middle Level (Grades 6-9). Canada: Saskatchewan Education.
Skehan, P. (2001). “A Non-marginal Role for Tasks”. ELT Journal, 56(3), 289-295.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output and its development. In S. Gass, C. Maden (Eds.). Input in Second Language Acquisition. Roleway, Mass: Newbury House.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output and its development. In S. Gass, C. Maden (Eds.). Input in Second Language Acquisition. Roleway, Mass: Newbury House.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based in-struction. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376-401.
Trachsel, M. &Severino, C. (2004). The Challenges of Integrating and Balancing Speaking and Writing in First-Year Rhetoric Classes.
Ur, P. (2006). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and theory (13th Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Harlow: Longman.
Wilson, J. A. (1997). A program to develop the listening and speaking skills of children in a first grade classroom. In C. Smith, (Ed). Skills students use when speaking and listening. Retrieved November, 15,2008, from http://eric.indiana.edu

Downloads

Publicado

2020-01-20

Como Citar

TABRIZI, S. J. R.; GOLDOUZ, S.; BADR, B. H. THE EFFECTS OF CONVERGENT AND DIVERGENT TASKS ON IRANIAN EFL SPEAKING PERFORMANCE. Práxis Educacional, Vitória da Conquista, v. 16, n. 37, p. 277-292, 2020. DOI: 10.22481/praxisedu.v16i37.6170. Disponível em: https://periodicos2.uesb.br/index.php/praxis/article/view/6170. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2024.