Keys in building knowledge of inclusive education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22481/praxisedu.v17i45.8140

Keywords:

knowledge construction, inclusive education, diasporism, transpositions, genealogical , entanglements, defining problems

Abstract

the theory of inclusive education by making explicit an open nature requires thinking about what it does in the world and how it solves certain problems, trying to visualize on what other things its work articulates. Inclusive education, not belonging exactly to the regionalization signified as special education, reaffirms that its defining contours have been established through a set of misunderstandings of approximation to the term itself. The objective of this work is to analyze some of its heuristic premises to understand its mechanisms of knowledge production. The method used is the critical documentary review. Among its main conclusions, the work identifies that the knowledge structure of what we call inclusive education is made up of a diversity of voices that contribute to the understanding of various topics and links with the various structures of the world and their systems, demanding the adoption of new methods for problems that cannot be understood under the conservative purism of methodological work. The territories of the inclusive construct a neo-materialist epistemology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Aldo Ocampo González, Centro de Estudios Latinoamericanos de Educación Inclusiva (CELEI) - Chile

Doctor en Ciencias de la Educación, aprobado Sobresaliente mención ‘Cum Laude’ por unanimidad por la Universidad de Granada, España. Teórico y ensayista educativo. Director fundador del Centro de Estudios Latinoamericanos de Educación Inclusiva (CELEI), Chile.

References

ANG-LYGATE, Magdalene. (2008). “Trazar los espacios de deslocalización. De la teorización a la diáspora”, en: FABARDO, Mercedes. (Edit.). Feminismos negros. Una antología. (pp.291-314). Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.

ANTHIAS, Floya. (1998). Rethinking Social Divisions: Some Notes Towards a Theoretical Framework. Sociological Review, 46(3), 505-535.

BRAH, Avtar. (2011). Cartografías de la diáspora. Identidades en cuestión. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.

BRAIDOTTI, Rosi. (2009). Transposiciones. Barcelona: Gedisa.

BRAIDOTTI, Rosi. (2013). Feminismo, diferencia sexual y subjetividad nómade. Barcelona: Gedisa.

BRAIDOTTI, Rosi. (2020). Sujetos nómades. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

CULLER, Jonathan. (2009). Structuralist Poetics. Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. London: Routledge & Kegan Pau.

DAVIS, Kathy. (2014). “Intersectionality as a Critical Mathodology”; en: LYKKE, N. (Ed.) Writing Academic Texts Differently: Intersectional Feminist Methodologies and the Playful Art of Writing. (pp. 268-281). New York: Routledge.

GONZÁLEZ, Brais. (2018). La ética diferencial de Rosi Braidotti. Agora. Papeles de filosofia, 37(2), 173-191.

DELEUZE, G. & GUATTARI, F. (1970). La lógica de sentido. Barcelona: Edit. Six Barral.

GUATTARI, Félix. (1992). Las tres ecologías. México: FCE.

KYROLE, Katarina, KOIVUNEN, Anu & RYBERG, Ingrid. (2019). Vulnerability as political language. Recuperado el 24 de junio de 2020: https://www.manchesteropenhive.com/view/9781526133113/9781526133113.00005.xml

LUZT, Helma. (2001). Intersectionality as. DiGeSt. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1-2 (2015), pp. 39-44.

MASSEY, Doreen (1994). Space, Place and Gender. London: Routledge

OCAMPO, Aldo. (2016). “Gramática de la Educación Inclusiva: ejes críticos para cartografiar sus condiciones de producción y funcionamiento epistémico”, en: Ocampo, A. (Comp.). Ideología, discapacidad y dominación: los imaginarios constitutivos de la discapacidad en Latinoamérica. (73-159 pp.). Santiago: Fondo Editorial CELEI.

OCAMPO, Aldo. (2017). Epistemología de la educación inclusiva. Granada: UGR.

OCAMPO, Aldo. (2019). Contornos teóricos de la educación inclusiva. Revista Boletín Redipe, Vol. 8 (3), 66-95.

OCAMPO, Aldo. (2020). En torno al verbo incluir: performatividades heurísticas de la educación inclusiva. Quaest.disput, 13 (27), 18-54.

OPPERMANN, Serpil. (2010). The rhizomatic trajectory of ecocriticism. Recuperado el 27 de noviembre de 2020 de: https://ecozona.eu/article/view/314

OPPERMANN, Serpil. (2011). Ecocriticism's Theoretical Discontents. Recuperado el 25 de marzo de 2020 de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236830201_Ecocriticism's_Theoretical_Discontents

RICHARD, Nelly. (2020). De la revuelta social a la nueva constitución en Chile. Conferencia leída el 16 de diciembre de 2020 en el Centro Cultural Kirchner. Recuperado el día 28 de diciembre de 2020 de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIl8SJEW9Hw

Published

2021-04-01

How to Cite

GONZÁLEZ, A. O. Keys in building knowledge of inclusive education. Práxis Educacional, Vitória da Conquista, v. 17, n. 45, p. 338-356, 2021. DOI: 10.22481/praxisedu.v17i45.8140. Disponível em: https://periodicos2.uesb.br/index.php/praxis/article/view/8140. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2024.